The urban legend of Curt Schilling’s bloody sock has resurfaced, thanks to the comments of Orioles broadcaster Gary Thorne. Today’s Boston Globe has the details.
“It gets stupider,” Schilling said with a tone of resignation in his voice. “I got the 9-inch scar for you. You can see it.
“There are some bad people in your line of work, man.”
I covered the 2004 ALCS and World Series for the Baltimore Sun, when Schilling took the mound with that big red splotch on his sock. Within the press corps, there was growing cynicism that Schilling was milking his heroics for all they were worth. It made for great copy, but soon a conspiracy theory surfaced that the red spot on his sock wasn’t really blood — that it was food coloring or paint. A Sun columnist pushed that angle harder than most, and during the World Series, my editors asked me to pursue it as a news story.
After Boston took the first two games of the World Series, the series moved to St. Louis. I was standing in the visitor’s clubhouse at Busch Stadium, when I suddenly found myself alone with Red Sox GM Theo Epstein. Considering how massive the World Series press corps is, this was my chance for a rare exclusive. I had known Theo since 1998, when he was in law school and working in the Padres baseball operations department. Of all the questions I could have asked him at that moment (coming off Boston’s miraculous uprising from a 3-0 deficit against the Yankees in the ALCS to a 2-0 lead in the World Series), I mumbled something about needing official confirmation that it was indeed blood on Schilling’s sock.
Theo let out a big sigh and said, “Blood and fluid.” We spoke for about 20 more seconds alone, and he went back to watching his team win its first World Series since 1918. They say, “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” and this urban legend has now resurfaced three years later. Thorne said Red Sox catcher Doug Mirabelli later confirmed to him that the spot wasn’t blood, but last night, Mirabelli denied saying that.
I don’t mind going against the grain as a reporter for my editors. About that, let me be clear. It was because of passive reporting by myself and other baseball writers that the game’s steroid problem didn’t really surface before Ken Caminiti’s confession in 2003. Going against the grain is what David Halberstam did for the New York Times and later in his book “The Best and the Brightest” in covering the Vietnam war. But this was about a red spot on a sock. And that moment with Theo remains one of the low points of my career.