<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bumper Roundup</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/2008/04/28/bumper-roundup/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MotorMouth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tribute 507 Taking Shape</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/2008/04/28/bumper-roundup/#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>MotorMouth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tribute 507 Taking Shape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/2008/04/28/bumper-roundup/#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>[...] talked about a good front bumper and reader Gary suggested a Mustang. He wins. I never talked with Vescio&#8217;s about it, but they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] talked about a good front bumper and reader Gary suggested a Mustang. He wins. I never talked with Vescio&#8217;s about it, but they [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Palmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/2008/04/28/bumper-roundup/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/2008/04/28/bumper-roundup/#comment-786</guid>
		<description>It is strange to think of how similar styling is and how you can always tell a car's era, even when it's a "futuristic" design.

Car makers sometimes emphasize that particular vehicles are "clean sheet" designs, created from scratch, fresh, with no preconceived notions. And yet whatever present they're sketching in still exerts its influence, locking their design in time even though every line, curve, shape and dimension that can be created is available to their imaginations. Or is it?

Maybe that's the catch. No matter how creative the designer he or she still draws from what already exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is strange to think of how similar styling is and how you can always tell a car&#8217;s era, even when it&#8217;s a &#8220;futuristic&#8221; design.</p>
<p>Car makers sometimes emphasize that particular vehicles are &#8220;clean sheet&#8221; designs, created from scratch, fresh, with no preconceived notions. And yet whatever present they&#8217;re sketching in still exerts its influence, locking their design in time even though every line, curve, shape and dimension that can be created is available to their imaginations. Or is it?</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s the catch. No matter how creative the designer he or she still draws from what already exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave g</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/2008/04/28/bumper-roundup/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>dave g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/2008/04/28/bumper-roundup/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>I'd say so far the Mustang bumper, with the early Ford nerfs is the closest match.

Those nerfs are pretty close. It's amazing how similar the styling is, and it makes me think that automotive styling has always had a rather incestuous nature.

No idea too good to steal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say so far the Mustang bumper, with the early Ford nerfs is the closest match.</p>
<p>Those nerfs are pretty close. It&#8217;s amazing how similar the styling is, and it makes me think that automotive styling has always had a rather incestuous nature.</p>
<p>No idea too good to steal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
