The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety decided to test what they learned in science class in high school and discovered–Gasp!–it’s still true. Big objects still win out in collisions with small ones. Yes, when the 300-pound linebacker on the football team hits the 145 pound kicker head on, the little guy still sails farther.
The test the institute made, as you likely already know, was to smash road tots like a Smart Car, Honda Fit, and
Toyota Yaris head-on into a Mercedes C-Class, Accord and Camry with each car doing 40 mph. They align the vehicles so that the drivers’ sides hit (about 40 percent of each front-end makes contact).
There is no basis in logic or denial to assume anything other than what did happen, would, in these collisions. The little cars got damaged much more severely. There was significant intrusion into the little cars’ passenger compartments. Featherweights can’t knock heavyweights out of the ring. A Bobcat can’t push a Caterpillar D10 aside.
“Safe” is a loaded word with no stand-alone meaning. It has meaning only in context. Knives are safe in a drawer and usually in a chef’s hand; less so wielded by a killer.
Tiny cars are not inherently unsafe because you might get hurt if a big car hits you head on. You’ll get hurt more on a motorcycle or scooter, still more on a bicycle, and if you’re walking by the road with only some khakis or a skirt between you and the sedan, we don’t need a study to announce “Skirts Unsafe in Frontal Collision.” Motorcycles, scooters, bicycles, skateboards, Skat-Skootas, and Chuck Taylors are not inherently unsafe. They’re just not well matched against a ton-and-a-half of steel going 40 miles an hour.
It took years and thousands of deaths for people to realize that many SUVs with short wheelbases and high centers of gravity were unsafe when they went off the edge of the road and rolled over, collapsing their roofs with their substantial weight. Were they inherently unsafe? They were unsafe in that circumstance—but did well in collisions in which they remained upright. Big, heavy vehicles can also be a downer if you end up in a lake, whereas a VW Beetle will float a while. Safety is relative.
To borrow from the gun lobby, cars don’t kill people, drivers kill people. Any car of any size, as well as motorcycles, scooters, bicycles, unicycles, roller skates can be operated safely. If we all try our best to do so, we won’t kill ourselves and we won’t kill others, no matter what form of transportation we choose.
The Department of Transportation’s study of all reported car crashes in the United States in 2005 shows that head-on crashes with another vehicle accounted for just two percent of all crashes that year and 3.4 percent of injury crashes, but 10.1 percent of fatal crashes. Single-vehicle collisions with a pole, tree, ditch or guardrail accounted for another 11.1 of all single-vehicle accidents, but 21.5 percent of fatalities and 12.8 percent of injuries.
When vehicle occupants in a head-on collision aren’t protected by seat belts or airbags, they risk almost certain death. Even if occupants do use some type of safety restraint in a head-on crash, the most likely result is death, at 28.6 percent of head-on collisions, followed by minor injuries, at 15.3 percent, and incapacitating injuries, at 9.1 percent. Severe injuries commonly seen in survivors of head-on crashes include traumatic brain injuries; internal damage; spinal injuries and multiple fractures. Less serious wounds from a head-on collision can include head and neck injuries, back injuries, broken bones and significant cuts and bruises.
Head-on crashes in which a single vehicle collides with a fixed object are the deadliest kind of head-on crash. That’s because the fronts of vehicles are designed to take the force of a head-on impact. In a multiple-vehicle frontal crash, both vehicles’ fronts absorb part of the impact. But in a single-vehicle crash between a car and another kind of object, only one vehicle is absorbing the force of the crash. Much of the rest of it is absorbed by the occupant or occupants of the vehicle — with deadly results.
Perhaps not surprisingly, the majority of head-on collisions between multiple vehicles take place when both of the vehicles involved are going straight on an undivided road. A 1999 study of crash data by the federal Department of Transportation showed that most head-on collisions happen when a car accidentally moves from its own lane into oncoming traffic. The majority, 68 percent, of head-on fatalities happened when cars were going straight but strayed from their lanes; 23 percent took place when drivers strayed while following bends in the road. Only a minority, 4.2 percent, of the fatal head-on crashes they studied were caused by a driver’s attempt to pass. Other causes of head-on collisions can include rerouting in construction zones, poorly maintained roads and defective auto parts.
More facts about head-on collisions:
The federal government currently requires that all new cars be able to withstand a head-on crash with a solid object at 30 miles per hour and another at 35 miles per hour.
The first model year subjected to frontal crash tests was 1980.
Head-on collisions are more common outside cities; they make up 13 percent of all fatal rural crashes, but less than 7 percent of all fatal urban crashes.
More than 86 percent of head-on collisions in 2005 took place between intersections.
California led the nation in sheer number of head-on collisions in 2005, with Texas and Florida tied for second place.
Like all car crashes, head-on crashes are almost always caused by bad decisions — negligent driving — by one or more of the drivers involved. It’s known that 95 percent of all car crashes are caused by driver error; the DOT has found that most crashes happen within three seconds of a driver distraction, such as fiddling with the radio, dialing a handheld device or excessive sleepiness. Impaired driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol is also a significant cause of auto accidents, and is exacerbated in many cases by speeding.
In recent years, transportation safety authorities have realized that differences in size between two vehicles are the main cause of death in multiple-vehicle crashes. One study found that in a head-on collision between a passenger car and a light truck (such as an SUV, van or pickup truck), the occupants of the car were 3.3 times as likely to be killed. When a larger vehicle and a smaller one collide, the occupants of the smaller vehicle are likely to sustain more serious injuries because the higher bumper and other protruding features of the larger vehicle are at the level of the heads and necks of the occupants of the smaller vehicle. The force of the impact “deforms” the smaller vehicle, pushing jagged metal and glass into the area where occupants sit, potentially crushing or cutting their vulnerable heads and necks.
2% of crashes = head-ons.
Thanks for the details, Frank. Be interesting to watch these statistics evolve. We have so many distractions now, with all our communications and entertainment devices. And of course there are more cars and drivers.
I remember you saying you had a motorcycle. I just got my “new” one, which I’ve mentioned here. Absolutely love it. But I keep my eyes open, all around. With all the construction on 35W, the main highway I ride on, I watch the mirror too when I slow down, looking to avoid the person dialing or texting who isn’t slowing down for me. I position myself so I can zip to one side or the other of the car in front of me and hope I react quick enough to be fully out of harm’s way.
A man I’ve done a lot of work for got rearended about 2 weeks ago by a young woman looking at her cell phone. She damaged three vehicles….
I don’t have those distrations. No cell phone- Oh, I’ve overhead cell phone conversations- what a pile of useless blather. Seldom have the radio on- Hey, if I want to listen to non-stop commercials I can flip the TV on. Oh- don’t watch that garbage much either. No drive-throughs- When I stuff my face, I sit down somewhere and ENJOY what I’m eating.
Those chain-reaction accidents are something else. I was a VERY CLOSE witness to one last summer. Scenario: two lane main drag through town, line of cars- Whoops, I mean, pickups and SUVs- all blast out of the gate on the green. Cross r.r. tracks then it becomes double lanes and residential cross streets. I took the right lane cuz I usually get my doors blown off even if I go 5 over. So the lead vehicle wants to turn left onto a rez street. He signals well in advance then comes to a stop. Well guzzler #2 (cell-phone-stuck-to-head boy) is off in LA-LA land and doesn’t notice turning man until it’s too late. He locks ‘em up and maybe wouldn’t have hit very hard… but then vehicles 3, 4, 5, and 6, who are ALL TAILGATING and have their heads up their butts in varying degrees, all proceed to smash into #2, like dominoes falling. I, in my little slow-moving car in the right lane, witness the whole thing mere feet away. You know what? Some serious schaudenfreude kicked in on my part. They were all guilty of inattentive driving, stop light gran prix, tailgating, speeding, and if that isn’t enough, being stupid enough to commute in giant gas guzzlers. They all left some plastic on the road and higher insurance bills for the rest of us.
MotorMouth Kris Palmer, freelance auto writer and editor, blogs about vintage cars, the collectible auto scene and just about anything else that goes vroom.
Your favorite: classic car blog, antique car blog, muscle car blog, vintage car blog. Antique and classic cars for sale by owner.
Have a collectible car to sell?
Try an enhanced classified listing for "Antiques, Classic & Customized" where you can upload photos of your vehicle, provide contact information, and filter through inquiries with ease. Sell your collectible classic online.
Learn more about RSS
Search Yellow Pages: