Adjustable rate mortgages have been dragged through the mud in recent months. Much of it’s justified. But there are reasons to get an ARM and Bankrate.com goes through just what they are in their new real estate guide:
They say to consider an ARM, if:
1) You’re good with your money
2) You don’t plan to stay in a house long
3) You expect significant salary increases and bonuses
As for life stage, they say ARMS are:
GOOD for young people: “If you’re buying a first home or starter home that you expect to upgrade as you have children and earn promotions”
BAD for parents with young kids: “If you’ve upsized to your dream home — or at least a house you see yourself in for a decade or more — you’ll generally benefit by sticking with the security of a fixed rate”
GOOD for parents with teens: “An ARM can be a good choice for families who need every extra penny for college and retirement savings, and who will have extra cash once junior’s tuition bill has been paid off. It’s also beneficial for people who plan to own a home for only a few years before downsizing to a smaller place once the kids are out of the house. Be sure, however, that you’re willing to sell before the introductory term is up or be willing to sacrifice savings that may be better used for your golden years”
BAD for retirees:”ARMs are rarely good choices for those living on a fixed income, as most retirees do”
Maybe an ARM would have been good for us, because it would have given us a kick in the pants a year or two ago to sell the fixer-upper starter home. Then again, maybe we would have just had to refinance last year.
I think we’re going to see the starter-home/trading-up after three or four years phenomenon supressed for some time. We purchased a two story, three bedroom home in a modest St. Paul neighborhood for $149,000 in 2002. Then we fixed it up, and hired people to fix it up and now owe $159,000 on the property because we’ve redone the thing from top to bottom and used took some money out of a refinance in 2004 to finish part of the basement. It was recently assessed by the city at $183,000. Trading up with a wad of home equity to help us buy a much nicer home in a much nicer neighborhood just doesn’t seem sensible today, and I can’t see that changing any time soon.
Many others are wearing similar shoes, or worse because they purchased in ‘05 or ‘06 with the idea that they could sell and trade up in a couple of years. I think homeowners could see their tenure in the house last much longer than the 5 to 7 years that seemed so far off when they signed up.