StarTribune.com

investing


Searching for solace in quirky stock market indicators

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

This just in from David Joy, chief investment strategist at Ameriprise-subsidiary RiverSource Investments — an amusing take at what an ox, a groundhog and a sports team can tell us about where the stock market is headed in 2009. Read his musings and weigh in on whether any of these indicators are worth the blogosphere it’s posted on.

First, the Chinese New Year began last week and it is the Year of the Ox. While neither a fundamental nor a technical indicator, the ox is believed to be a sign of prosperity through patience and hard work. It is considered to be patient, tireless in its work and capable of enduring hardship without complaint. These qualities may be in high demand in the current market environment.

Second, there is the Super Bowl indicator. (more…)

Dave Kansas on the end of Wall Street

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

I interviewed St. Paul native Dave Kansas about his new book “The Wall Street Journal Guide to The End of Wall Street As We Know It.” I couldn’t fit all of the nuggets into my column so here’s the rest of the interview:

Q: Who would you say the book is written for?
A: It’s for the vast majority of people out there who know we’re in a financial crisis but don’t really understand how or why we’re in that crisis. I think a lot about my family. They’re not steeped in financial news, but they’re incredibly curious about all the stuff that’s happening and how it came to be like this. So I was trying to write for people who just wanted to figure out “What the heck happened?” in a way that would be accessible, so they would be better equipped to sort out what they ought to do.

Q: You were just in the Twin Cities. Describe how is the mood in New York different from the mood here?
A: The mood in New York is much grimmer as it relates to the economy than it was in the Twin Cities. And I think that’s because the because the New York economy is so tightly tied to what happens on Wall Street. And there’s been so much damage, carnage and job loss on Wall Street that people can’t help but think about it. Things are more diverse in the Twin Cities. There is a large financial community there, of course, but it’s less a big money hub as it is in Manhattan, which is why the Bernard Madoff story was surprising as it related to the Twin Cities.

Q: Can you talk about the challenge of writing a book on a topic where news breaks daily?
A: It’s just like writing a magazine story with longer lead time. My last chance to really look at it was in mid-December. You need to kind of focus on the bigger trends in place and become a little less detailed oriented. That worked in terms of writing about the automakers and Citigroup. It didn’t work so well in terms of mentioning now-departed John Thain of Merrill Lynch or Bank of America.

Q: Would you say you’ve changed how you’re managing your money in the past few months?
A: I have not changed much, but I toyed with taking cash I had available and investing it in the stock market back in September and I thought about it again in December and I thought about it again this month. For me and for other people, what’s important is the ability to sleep well at night and not about getting into the market at a perfect time.

Q: In the book, you mention a return to thrift. Do you think that will be by choice or by force, because credit has dried up and income is down?
A: I think it’s mostly happening by choice. Even with the unemployment rate the way it is, 80 to 90 percent of the workforce probably hasn’t seen much change in their material situation. But people know enough people who are being forced into a change and the headlines are such that people can’t help but notice that things are different. I hear stories about people all the time whose financial situations haven’t changed at all who are eating at home instead of eating out, who are taking the bus instead of taking a cab, or bringing a sack lunch to work instead of ordering in Chinese food, not buying the season tickets, just buying a couple of tickets. The psychology around money has really changed for a lot of people. I’m traveling less, eating at home a lot more, trying to figure out ways to save money here and there.

Q: Do you think the shift towards thrift will be permanent?
A: No, nothing is permanent. But we went through a process like this in the late 1980s and early 1990s in the wake of the “Greed is good” decade. There was a kind of a moving away from ostentatious displays of wealth and we’re seeing a similar thing now. President Barack Obama spoke of an era of responsibility and I think a lot of people are embracing that.

Q: Any rays of hope in this economy?
A: I think the new administration has a smart economic team and I think that they’re going to work hard to help solve the problems we have. Also, we sometimes lose sight of how vast and complicated the U.S. economy is and that there’s a lot of creativity and a lot of small business activity that flies under the radar screen that’s going to be the source of a rebound. The other important thing is historical context. We haven’t had a rough recession in almost 30 years, but we got through that one too. We can’t lose track of the fact that the economic cycle comes back, even if it gets bad before that happens. I think we’re going to start to see that within a year.

Your online broker

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Frequent reader Brian has this question: Since stocks and mutual funds are “on sale” any recommendations on a discount/online broker?

Today’s a good day to ask that question. The market certainly didn’t get caught up in the Inauguration Day inspiration and excitement.

The Dow is currently trading below 8,000, although it won’t close for another couple of minutes.

Stocks on sale indeed.

Let’s hope they don’t get marked down again tomorrow!

Want the skinny from investment newsletters without the $30,000 price tag?

Friday, January 16th, 2009

Like another print medium I’m intimately familiar with, investor newsletter subscriptions have been on the decline for years because of the web. I’m not terribly familiar with these publications because many of them don’t offer free subscriptions for journalists and I don’t have hundreds of dollars lying around to invest in them.

I figure that if someone said something of interest in one of these newsletters, it will hit the web some way, some how, for free. Or someone will write about it and I can learn about it through their lens. Not ideal, but hey, times are tough!

But a new site launched last week called Zepinvest aims to provide investment insight to the masses.

Their CEO walked me through the site, which currently offers more than 80 investor newsletters for $600 per year with new ones signing up regularly. Zepinvest claims that individual subscriptions for these investment web sites would cost $30,000 annually.

There is a 7-day trial period that you can use to peruse offerings.

As for how they choose them? CEO Michael Radov says Zepinvest execs look for paid content with a loyal following that’s been around for at least two years. He was somewhat vague about whether the newsletter authors need a track record of providing good advice, but said performance is a consideration and ZepInvest looks to ratings from places such as longtime investment newsletter tracker Hulbert Interactive for guidance.

You can search the site by most viewed, most recent, and by topic. You are also supposed to be able to search by stock ticker, but the search function wasn’t working during my tour; the site is still in beta mode.

It’s an interesting concept but I’ve got to say that $600 is still a lot of money for this buy and hold investor to pay for investment content. And like newspapers, I think it’s a tough sell for consumers used to getting their info online fast and free.

Investing is like…

Tuesday, December 30th, 2008

From time-to-time, a reader sends me a good investing analogy that I want to share. The following was sent to me by Deephaven insurance agent Pete Giancola. Send your own to kmcguire@startribune.com or add them to the blog via the comment feature.

Investors are like the pony express riders. There were successful ones and not so successful ones

The Pony express went from St. Louis, MO to Sacramento, CA. delivering the mail. How many of those riders ever rode the exact same horse the entire way?

None. All of the riders brought three other horses with them so when one horse got tired the rider changed to a fresh horse that could keep the rider going towards Sacramento and eventually to their goal. They assessed all of their needs and the different environments along the way and adjusted accordingly. They decided which path to take, they decided which horse to ride and they brought spares to change to if the horse they were riding got tired along the way.

How many investors are just like the rider that tries to ride the exact same horse the entire way? They find themselves in the desert with a horse that is laying on the ground pouring water on the horse hoping it will get up again so that they continue to their destination. They rarely look at their portfolio, they rarely look at the asset classes they own, they rarely care about their financial well being, but they definitely want to be standing in Sacramento (retirement).

Investors should be bringing along their spares to be able to continue their journey while constantly re-assessing what their needs are to get to their destination. Situations change.