How to deal with Iran

November 2nd, 2007 – 1:00 PM by Dennis J. McGrath

Iran is becoming a central issue in the Democratic presidential race. It was a key point of contention in the Democratic debate earlier this week, and now Barack Obama is making it a key focus — giving a long interview with the New York Times on the issue.

Obama.jpg
Barack Obama

Obama is stressing the importance of talking to Iran without preconditions, insisting on behavior change — as opposed to regime change — and using both carrots and sticks to encourage that change in behavior.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile, was the only Democratic presidential candidate to vote for a resolution declaring the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization. John Edwards, in Tuesday’s debate, called it a document that read as if it were written by the neocons.

“I mean, has anybody read this thing? I mean, it literally gave Bush and Cheney exactly what they wanted,” he said.

Here are several links for additional reading.

On Thursday Clinton was among 30 senators who sent a letter to President Bush stating that he did not have authority to initiate military action against Iran. The Huffington Post pointed out that Obama did not sign the letter. A couple hours later, Obama went a step further, introducing a resolution to the same effect. Here’s the story on Politically Connected. And here’s the Huffington Post’s report and here’s The Swamp’s report.

Here’s the NYT story about their interview with Obama. And here’s the transcript of the interview.

Last week, Clinton attacked Obama for attacking her over the Iran vote. In an e-mail she sent to Iowans, Clinton said that in 2006 Obama advocated the very position he’s now criticizing. The NYT’s Caucus wrote about this flap and reprinted Clinton’s e-mail.

What do you make of this clash between Clinton and Obama over Iran? Was Clinton right to vote for the resolution declaring the Guards a terrorist group? Do you agree with Obama’s approach to Iran. And how will the fracture over this issue affect the battle for the Democratic nomination?

One response to "How to deal with Iran"

wishIwuz2 says:

November 2nd, 2007 at 3:28 pm

Front-runner Clinton made the safe move by signing the Kyl/Lieberman measure. No surprise.

Declaring the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization panders to the right without officially authorizing Bush to go to war. Bush may try to claim that it does, but that would be another stretch (and he doesn’t have Gonzales to make his cases anymore). Clinton DID sign the Senate letter denying Bush congressional war approval. All positioning.

But however safe it was, supporting Kyl/Lieberman wasn’t really a brave move. Being brave is for the “also-rans” now, including Obama.

*The Huffington Post pointed out that Obama did not sign the letter.*

According to the links above, Obama was out campaigning, and simply missed the signing.