Polls show gaps opening, or not

December 16th, 2007 – 9:54 PM by Dennis J. McGrath

The landscape continues to shift rapidly in Iowa, where recent polls show Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee with gaps over their rivals.

Or, in Obama’s case, maybe not.

Obama.jpg
Barack Obama

Polling in advance of a caucus is a challenge, because there are a smaller number of caucus-goers than, say, voters in a general election, or even a primary. About 150,000 Democrats and 80,000 Republicans are expected to show up on the night of Thursday, Jan. 3.

Trying to figure out which candidate people support is merely the second task for pollsters. The first task is figuring out who will give up Grey’s Anatomy to do their civic duty.

So it’s not a big surprise that polls are showing a wide spread in results.

In Iowa, for example, Strategic Vision found Obama leading Hillary Rodham Clinton 33 percent to 25 percent, just barely within the poll’s margin of sampling error (The poll was taken 12/08-10; with 600 Likely Voters; with a MoE +/-4.5).

And the Quad City Times had Obama up by 9 points, with 33 percent, to Clinton’s and John Edwards’ 24 percent (12/10-13; 500 LV; MoE 4.5).

But another poll taken at about the same time, by The Hotline, shows the race a tie between Obama and Clinton at 27, with Edwards trailing at 22. (12/07-12; 569 LV; MoE 4)

Finally, Rasmussen has Clinton in the lead 29-26 over Obama, with Edwards again at 22. (12/10; 1106 LV; MoE 3).

On the Republican side, it’s a lot less complicated. It’s Huckabee, Huckabee, Huckabee and Huckabee. His margins range from 5 points (Strategic Vision) to 16 points (Rasmussen) in the last four polls. The big question for Huckabee is whether his newfound popularity will be matched by his supporters actually showing up at caucuses.

Mike_Huckabee.jpg
Mike Huckabee

Mitt Romney receives 22 to 25 percent support in the polls, Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson are at about 10 percent, and John McCain is at about 6 percent.

In New Hampshire, it’s a different story, with Romney holding leads of 12 to 15 points in the last four polls (FOX News, Concord Monitor, Rassmussen, Suffolk U/WHDH.) McCain comes in second in three of the four.

But the Democratic race is a muddle in New Hampshire, just as it is in Iowa. Clinton leads by 7 points (Suffolk U/WHDH) and 9 points (FOX), but Obama leads by 1 (Concord) and 3 (Rasmussen).

Nationwide, it’s as it’s always been — Clinton and Giuliani leading their respective fields, although Huckabee now has gained a toehold in one poll — Rasmussen’s 4-day tracking poll, where he holds a 2-point margin over Giuliani.

For more on these and other polls, go to Real Clear Politics, an excellent resource for polls.

5 Responses to "Polls show gaps opening, or not"

wishIwuz2 says:

December 17th, 2007 at 7:36 am

So, this is great news, or not. I think maybe I’m sorta confident about my candidate’s chances.

All better now.

Robert Grant says:

December 17th, 2007 at 11:41 am

Syl Jones: When will hate go one step further?
It takes just a small percentage of Americans to make this country unlivable for many others. Should we ignore them? And what if we do?

Dennis,
I’m hoping “politically connected” also refers to politically correct issues. This may be the most hypocritical contribution ever made to any news source. Syl Jones making recommendations on how to be politically correct.
And your management continues to seek solutions for improvement, and increased revenue. Very funny, Dennis.

bsimon says:

December 17th, 2007 at 1:41 pm

“Nationwide, it’s as it’s always been — Clinton and Giuliani leading their respective fields”

Except where people are paying closer attention. In those states, people are supporting candidates other than the high-name-recognition candidates Clinton & Giuliani. Thank God.

Robert Grant says:

December 18th, 2007 at 11:47 am

Are these the same polls that have been so accurate over the last ten years?

If so, why even discuss the figures?

Robert Grant says:

December 18th, 2007 at 12:01 pm

Dennis,

As a side note, I have lived in Minnesota since 1967, and I have never been contacted by the Strib concerning any polls. I used to subscribe to this paper until it became such a one-sided, agenda driven rag. Why do you suppose that is?

I guess it’s like taking a poll in the inner city as opposed to a suburb such as Edina.

Maybe I’m not politically correct enough to understand the managements deep thinking liberal views.