<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday, Jan. 1, 1921: Women who wait</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/74</link>
	<description>Minnesota history at your fingertips</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Welter</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/74#comment-9675</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Welter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/74#comment-9675</guid>
		<description>Interesting observation, Michelle. The piece did appear in the Minneapolis Daily Star on the date shown above. What era would you say Margery Rea's writing style is more typical of?

In my microfilm browsing, I've read several newspaper wire stories and syndicated columns from the early 1920s, and can't say that Rea's style feels out of place. See, for example:

Saturday, July 31, 1920: Ponzi scheme
http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/270

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observation, Michelle. The piece did appear in the Minneapolis Daily Star on the date shown above. What era would you say Margery Rea&#8217;s writing style is more typical of?</p>
<p>In my microfilm browsing, I&#8217;ve read several newspaper wire stories and syndicated columns from the early 1920s, and can&#8217;t say that Rea&#8217;s style feels out of place. See, for example:</p>
<p>Saturday, July 31, 1920: Ponzi scheme<br />
<a href="http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/270" rel="nofollow">http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/270</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/74#comment-9674</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/oldnews/archives/74#comment-9674</guid>
		<description>There is no way that this piece was written in 1921 -- the writing style is all wrong for that era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way that this piece was written in 1921 &#8212; the writing style is all wrong for that era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
