<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are CT scans for the heart useless?</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2008/07/02/are-ct-scans-for-the-heart-useless/</link>
	<description>Patent Pending blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lauriston</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2008/07/02/are-ct-scans-for-the-heart-useless/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>lauriston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2008/07/02/are-ct-scans-for-the-heart-useless/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Mr. Lee, since when is the New York Times a proper source for a medical conclusion? "A faith in innovation ...." It seem to me that quote merely "begs the question" and provides only anoth reporter's opinion. Please, in your search for evidence, facts and medical reality do not rely on another publication. Refering to the Times article is fine, but to use their conclusion as evidence of something is not good reorting. Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Lee, since when is the New York Times a proper source for a medical conclusion? &#8220;A faith in innovation &#8230;.&#8221; It seem to me that quote merely &#8220;begs the question&#8221; and provides only anoth reporter&#8217;s opinion. Please, in your search for evidence, facts and medical reality do not rely on another publication. Refering to the Times article is fine, but to use their conclusion as evidence of something is not good reorting. Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
