<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mpls makes the list (again)</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2009/05/20/mpls-makes-the-list-again/</link>
	<description>Patent Pending blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Jaskulke</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2009/05/20/mpls-makes-the-list-again/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Jaskulke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2009/05/20/mpls-makes-the-list-again/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Tom,

The Millken Report pointed out that Minnesota (they really shouldn't have said Minneapolis since there are lots of life science firms on the St. Paul side) is near the top for medical devices but absolute bottom for biotech and health services.

I don't understand what they mean by health services since we are world renowed for the quality and innovation of our health care delivery system.

But it is great to be considered one of the players, and a top ten one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>The Millken Report pointed out that Minnesota (they really shouldn&#8217;t have said Minneapolis since there are lots of life science firms on the St. Paul side) is near the top for medical devices but absolute bottom for biotech and health services.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand what they mean by health services since we are world renowed for the quality and innovation of our health care delivery system.</p>
<p>But it is great to be considered one of the players, and a top ten one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Prater</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2009/05/20/mpls-makes-the-list-again/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Prater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/pending/2009/05/20/mpls-makes-the-list-again/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Our patent attorney per person density is also quite remarkable. We have more registration numbers per capita than many larger cities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our patent attorney per person density is also quite remarkable. We have more registration numbers per capita than many larger cities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
