Okay, that’s not exactly what the University of Minnesota tech transfer folks told me over lunch last week. But something like that.
Let’s back up. Destination 2025, a report released last month by BioBusiness Alliance of Minnesota and Deloitte Consulting, chided the U for losing ” its once-recognized leadership role in medical device research. [The school] must reestablish its premier status among universities by supporting research relevant to the medical device industry.”
I asked Jay Schrankler and Doug Johnson about this. The two men respectively run the Office of Technology Commercialization and the Venture Center, responsible for licensing U technology and spinning out new companies. They sort of shrugged.
First of all, big medical device makers like Medtronic and Boston Scientific collectively spend $3 billion a year on research and development, Schrankler said. The U’s research budget, by contrast, totals $600 million. Big Devices has the situation covered, he said.
Besides, the U is interested in next generation, world changing technology, Johnson said, not just incremental improvements to device technology that already exists. That’s why the U has shifted its focus from devices to biologics, he said.
Biotechnology, not devices, is the future, the two men say. They point to the work of Dr. Doris Taylor, a U scientist who stunned the science world last year with her work in regenerative medicine. Taylor and her team grew a beating rat heart in a jar, a technique that can eventually be applied to human organs. In other words, why would a patient need a pacemaker or an ICD when you can grow a new heart?
Of course, growing human hearts is at least decades away. And it’s not like the U is completely abandoning medical devices. Last June, the university opened a $400,000 Medical Devices Center, a hub for faculty, students and professionals to transform research into real companies.
But Shrankler and Johnson’s views represent an important shift in the U’s thinking, at least from a tech transfer point of view. The school that helped invent the pacemaker and the heart valve now believes its best chance of producing breakthrough technologies depends on its ability to manipulate cells and DNA, not wires and pulse generators.
This year, the U plans to spin out a new company based on Taylor’s research. The start-up will help pharmaceutical companies speed up research and development of drugs by testing their products on cells and tissue grown from Taylor’s technology. In theory, the technique will help drug makers determine which patients can’t tolerate certain medications.
Destination 2025 may have harshly criticized the U for perceived shortcomings. But it sounds like the U knows what it’s doing.