Indie-rock’s most overrated album?
Posted on July 1st, 2008 – 3:03 PMBy Chris Riemenschneider
A sign of just how much her career has nosedived in recent years, Liz Phair has resorted to putting out a 15th anniversary edition of her critically lauded debut “Exile in Guyville” this month with bonus tracks. Since when did 15 years become rehash time? She took it one step further by performing the album in its entirety over the past week in Chicago and in New York.
I came to appreciate Phair on later albums when she actually developed musical chops, especially “Whitechocolatespaceegg.” I even trumpeted her music after she proved to be a dim, bratty interview subject backstage at a Lilith Fair in the mid-90s. But then I came to completely loath her when she dressed up her sound with glossy production and undressed for her promo photos for 2003’s eponymous CD.
But through all that, my view on “Exile” never changed. It’s an example of what’s wrong with the world of rock criticism being heavily dominated by so many nerdy, pastey, homebound guys (how fitting that Pitchfork Media be a big modern purveyor of the album). Most critics were so turned on by Phair’s sexually explicit lyrics they didn’t get turned off by the fact that her singing is off-tune and awkward through much of the record. Who cares if she can’t sing worth a damn when she’s promising you terrific oral sex! They also ate up the album’s supposed tie-in to the Stones’ “Exile on Main Street,” which was mostly a bogus, hollow gimmick. “Guyville” had attitude and hip value, but it simply wasn’t an enjoyable listen. And it still isn’t. Don’t believe the hype… from 15 years ago, or today! Â
10 Responses to "Indie-rock’s most overrated album?"
I agree completely, but there’s no need to slam Pitchfork.
what is Loveless for 2000 Alex
Pitchfork needs to be slammed. They’re responsible for the narrow-definition of “indie rock” Pitchfork is more concerned with “trend-setting” that actual musical integrity or longevity. Who will be listening to Pitchforks’ hyped-band of the day in five years?….nobody.
Pitchfork has given us many forgettable bands from Clap Your Hands and Say Yeah to every crummy moog-synthesiser-Brooklyn-based band. vomit.
Love Liz or loathe her, Exile in Guyville is still extremely influential all over the world (just Google some of its lyrics), the album was not about musical chops or oral sex. 15 years in pop music is about four generations- Sha-Na-Na played Woodstock in 1969, about a dozen years from their sources…
I completely disagree with your thoughts on Exile Chris. This is stripped down folk-rock, and since when was rock and roll supposed to be perfect? It’s about emotion, feel and the moment. All of which are perfectly captured on Exile. However, with that said Exile was the only perfect recording Liz has ever made. Every thing after WhiteChocolate is utterly unlistenable pop garbage.
Comparing this album to Exile on Main Street is a joke.Pitchfork is rubbish.
Mana, been awhale beteewn listens to tihs alum by LipsFair. Overheated alum for indepth rokc anlog with JP Harvey whare she whimpers “drowne by the water’ adn Julia Hatfeld Experiment. Big choice would haves been Ecletcia brit brat connection is made, Mroe informatron alter.
Exile in Guyville is #47 on Entertainment Weekly’s top 100 albums of the last 25 years.
I disagree completely, and yes, there is a need to slam Pitchfork!
A year from now you’ll be claiming you saw the first gigs of the bands Pitchfork is covering today. Jealous little midwestern twerps. You can’t stand ANYone that accomplishes anything.


