<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An early peek at football rankings</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/</link>
	<description>The best of Minnesota high school sports</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6976</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6976</guid>
		<description>Anytime you lose your all-star quarterback in a spread offense, like Blaine has, there will be a transition period.  They still have a strong offensive and defensive line though, so they will be tough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime you lose your all-star quarterback in a spread offense, like Blaine has, there will be a transition period.  They still have a strong offensive and defensive line though, so they will be tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6951</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6951</guid>
		<description>This is true. Forgot about that part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true. Forgot about that part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6950</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6950</guid>
		<description>I'm sure there will be some effect on Woodbury, but Woodbury and Park do retain all their seniors for the coming year. East Ridge won't have a senior class. It will hurt them more in the 2010 season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure there will be some effect on Woodbury, but Woodbury and Park do retain all their seniors for the coming year. East Ridge won&#8217;t have a senior class. It will hurt them more in the 2010 season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6948</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/preps/2009/07/08/an-early-peek-at-football-rankings/#comment-6948</guid>
		<description>Won't the Royals be affected by the opening of East Ridge? Or am I off base. As I understand it East Ridge would be essentially a split of Woodbury and Park CG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t the Royals be affected by the opening of East Ridge? Or am I off base. As I understand it East Ridge would be essentially a split of Woodbury and Park CG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
