<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five things we&#8217;re thinking about</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/</link>
	<description>Exploring the soft underbelly of sports</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dwespisioto</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34466</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwespisioto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34466</guid>
		<description>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d prefer reading in my native language, because my knowledge of your languange is no so well. But it was interesting! Look for some my links:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodee</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34467</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34467</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com -</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34468</link>
		<dc:creator>Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34468</guid>
		<description>[...] These blogs are in the news         Request a Trackback     What I Should Have Said Theater  This is what Tiger Woods should have said about a comment by Golf Channel anchor Kelly Tilghman, who said the only way for young golfers to compete with Tiger Woods was to "lynch him in a back alley." "Kelly and I are friends, and I have ...  the poop - Last Updated -  21 minutes ago&#38;nbsp;    Request a Trackback     Five things we&#38;#8217;re thinking about  1. The Wild is apparently on the verge of being sold. Phase one of the Fasolamatt plan is soon to be complete. Your thoughts? 2. Someone should &#38;#8220;lynch Tiger Woods in a back alley.&#38;#8221; That&#38;#8217;s what she said, and Kelly Tilghman won&#38;#8217;t be saying much for ...  randball - Last Updated -  Friday January 25&#38;nbsp;     More Blogs...         Videos &#38;nbsp;      Related Stories &#38;nbsp;   Statue of Tiger Woods and his father unveiled in California kima - professional sports - 26 minutes ago           Stories &#38;nbsp;    Woods calls 'lynch' comment 'unfortunate,' says the matter is over kima - professional sports - 26 minutes ago Tiger Woods says Golf Channel anchor Kelly Tilghman meant no harm when she used the term "lynch" during television commentary about him, and he regards the issue closed as he returns to work this week.     &#38;nbsp;      function footerJump(szWhere) { location.href='/'+ szWhere + ".php"; }   Home&#38;nbsp;&#124;&#38;nbsp; Widgets&#38;nbsp;&#124;&#38;nbsp; Terms&#38;nbsp;&#124;&#38;nbsp; Privacy Copyright 2007 CDR Networks     _uacct = "UA-2278587-1"; urchinTracker(); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] These blogs are in the news         Request a Trackback     What I Should Have Said Theater  This is what Tiger Woods should have said about a comment by Golf Channel anchor Kelly Tilghman, who said the only way for young golfers to compete with Tiger Woods was to &#8220;lynch him in a back alley.&#8221; &#8220;Kelly and I are friends, and I have &#8230;  the poop - Last Updated -  21 minutes ago&#38;nbsp;    Request a Trackback     Five things we&#38;#8217;re thinking about  1. The Wild is apparently on the verge of being sold. Phase one of the Fasolamatt plan is soon to be complete. Your thoughts? 2. Someone should &#38;#8220;lynch Tiger Woods in a back alley.&#38;#8221; That&#38;#8217;s what she said, and Kelly Tilghman won&#38;#8217;t be saying much for &#8230;  randball - Last Updated -  Friday January 25&#38;nbsp;     More Blogs&#8230;         Videos &#38;nbsp;      Related Stories &#38;nbsp;   Statue of Tiger Woods and his father unveiled in California kima - professional sports - 26 minutes ago           Stories &#38;nbsp;    Woods calls &#8216;lynch&#8217; comment &#8216;unfortunate,&#8217; says the matter is over kima - professional sports - 26 minutes ago Tiger Woods says Golf Channel anchor Kelly Tilghman meant no harm when she used the term &#8220;lynch&#8221; during television commentary about him, and he regards the issue closed as he returns to work this week.     &#38;nbsp;      function footerJump(szWhere) { location.href=&#8217;/'+ szWhere + &#8220;.php&#8221;; }   Home&#38;nbsp;|&#38;nbsp; Widgets&#38;nbsp;|&#38;nbsp; Terms&#38;nbsp;|&#38;nbsp; Privacy Copyright 2007 CDR Networks     _uacct = &#8220;UA-2278587-1&#8243;; urchinTracker(); [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Peter Paulos</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34490</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Paulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34490</guid>
		<description>Is it Golden ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it Golden ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramon</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34473</link>
		<dc:creator>ramon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34473</guid>
		<description>Yes and yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Peter Paulos</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34474</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Paulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34474</guid>
		<description>Is there a Park in St. louis Park or a Valley in Golden Valley ....such are the unwanted but haunting questions I must face daily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a Park in St. louis Park or a Valley in Golden Valley &#8230;.such are the unwanted but haunting questions I must face daily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramon</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34475</link>
		<dc:creator>ramon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34475</guid>
		<description>"Can you live in St. Louis Park and still be a hipster?"

If the answer's yes I'm moving back in with my parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can you live in St. Louis Park and still be a hipster?&#8221;</p>
<p>If the answer&#8217;s yes I&#8217;m moving back in with my parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Peter Paulos</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34478</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Paulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34478</guid>
		<description>?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lattewarrior</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34477</link>
		<dc:creator>Lattewarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34477</guid>
		<description>I sure do miss E&#38;#38;G. The Tappy and Comet Morehouse rang my bell every time. E&#38;#38;G should franchise in Phoenix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure do miss E&#38;#38;G. The Tappy and Comet Morehouse rang my bell every time. E&#38;#38;G should franchise in Phoenix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Peter Paulos</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34479</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Paulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/01/10/five-things-were-thinking-about-26/#comment-34479</guid>
		<description>It was alarming, nonetheless, when Oprah poured her time, money (I heard) and recognizability into one of Obama's campaign swings. I know these celebs have rights too and can publicly back whoever they want, but they also have a responsibility to not fire up their squealing audiences (these women do..every day !) toward just one candidate. Personally, I'm not anything close to a Republican but I can't imagine a Romney being invited for a Oprah love fest..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was alarming, nonetheless, when Oprah poured her time, money (I heard) and recognizability into one of Obama&#8217;s campaign swings. I know these celebs have rights too and can publicly back whoever they want, but they also have a responsibility to not fire up their squealing audiences (these women do..every day !) toward just one candidate. Personally, I&#8217;m not anything close to a Republican but I can&#8217;t imagine a Romney being invited for a Oprah love fest..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
