Comments on: Five things we’re thinking about

By: Paul Peter Paulos

Paul Peter Paulos — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:30:48 +0000

Toonces, I swore the Packers had cheerleaders (though wearing very modest costumes) so I looked it up under WikiAnswers ….”The Green Bay Packers did have official cheerleaders, but the Packers decided not to reinstate them after the 1988 season”…don’t know why they did so except maybe cold weather has some visible effects on a body

By: Dave MN

Dave MN — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:42:11 +0000

Millen sacrificed cheerleaders to pay the salary of another receiver taken in the 1st round…

By: Toonces51

Toonces51 — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:40:10 +0000

JPF - The Packers are one of approximately six NFL teams not to have cheerleaders.

http://www.manlyweb.com/women/nfl/

Half of those teams are in the NFC North, where the Vikings have the most attractive cheerleaders. The Bears I get, due to the weather, and the Packers too, due to everyone in town not playing in the game being drunk on paint thinner by kickoff–but the Lions? They’ve played indoors forever*, and they don’t have cheerleaders?

*forever=my lifetime.

By: Ryan M

Ryan M — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:24:04 +0000

Check out Bill Simmons podcast The BS Report this week…they talk about Lavalle E. Neal III and question why he includes the III…funny stuff.

By: jpf

jpf — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:07:32 +0000

Id say GB by 2, that is after it comes out that Randy Moss can not come near any GB cheerleader due to restraining orders.

Mclovins…. gotta love the scrappy team. And by Scrappy, i mean as in “as engaging as Scrappy do was on Scooby do.”

Seantrel is the real deal.

By: Dave MN

Dave MN — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:44:38 +0000

How many points does either team get in that matchup if one of them doesn’t win this weekend?

By: Ryan M

Ryan M — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:33:16 +0000

I think that SB line is a bit low….I say NE -10