<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday (Barstool debates) edition: Wha&#8217; Happened?</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/</link>
	<description>Exploring the soft underbelly of sports</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victor Lebanon</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39132</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Lebanon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39132</guid>
		<description>St. Paul Saints
Minnesota Swarm
U of M Women's basketball
U of M Men's basketball
Minnesota Lynx 

All have the likelihood of winning championships before any of the four majors.

Stupid majors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St. Paul Saints<br />
Minnesota Swarm<br />
U of M Women&#8217;s basketball<br />
U of M Men&#8217;s basketball<br />
Minnesota Lynx </p>
<p>All have the likelihood of winning championships before any of the four majors.</p>
<p>Stupid majors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly Wannamaker</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39097</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly Wannamaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39097</guid>
		<description>Alike to others, I add that soccer has a better chance of becoming the fourth major sport and winning a championship than any o' dem teams.

"1. The new stadium will mean the team can spend more money. Maybe signing one big time Free Agent one of these years."

Are you kidding me, Jama?! Do you even follow the Twins. Everybody knows Carl will be using that money to pay down his financial obligation. Nonetheless I am with you due to reason number 4: they've won it before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alike to others, I add that soccer has a better chance of becoming the fourth major sport and winning a championship than any o&#8217; dem teams.</p>
<p>&#8220;1. The new stadium will mean the team can spend more money. Maybe signing one big time Free Agent one of these years.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you kidding me, Jama?! Do you even follow the Twins. Everybody knows Carl will be using that money to pay down his financial obligation. Nonetheless I am with you due to reason number 4: they&#8217;ve won it before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Peter Paulos</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39084</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Paulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39084</guid>
		<description>no such thing as a "solid nucleus" of players unless at absolute zero. Normally a nucleus is a miasma of high speed polar forces, and even the Twins new guy, All Wheels...No Stick...is not that fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no such thing as a &#8220;solid nucleus&#8221; of players unless at absolute zero. Normally a nucleus is a miasma of high speed polar forces, and even the Twins new guy, All Wheels&#8230;No Stick&#8230;is not that fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39078</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39078</guid>
		<description>+1 to Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 to Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Peter Paulos</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39077</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Paulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39077</guid>
		<description>ok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39076</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39076</guid>
		<description>None of the above.  NONE OF THE ABOVE!  I'll tell you, thsethfhthing is... STAY AWAY FROM MY WIFE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of the above.  NONE OF THE ABOVE!  I&#8217;ll tell you, thsethfhthing is&#8230; STAY AWAY FROM MY WIFE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave MN</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39075</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39075</guid>
		<description>At least his name is Spitzer and not Skeeter...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least his name is Spitzer and not Skeeter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39074</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39074</guid>
		<description>Which of the 4 locals would you put last to win a championship?

I'd say Wolves at least until Taylor sells the team. (So at least until Taylor's family sells the team long after he is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which of the 4 locals would you put last to win a championship?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say Wolves at least until Taylor sells the team. (So at least until Taylor&#8217;s family sells the team long after he is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Peter Paulos</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39073</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Paulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39073</guid>
		<description>got that, scagmando</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got that, scagmando</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scagmajor</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39072</link>
		<dc:creator>scagmajor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/03/11/tuesday-barstool-debates-edition-wha-happened/#comment-39072</guid>
		<description>PPP, was "polling his constituents" an intentional double entendre?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPP, was &#8220;polling his constituents&#8221; an intentional double entendre?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
