<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RandBall Q&#38;A: Michael Schur of &#8220;The Office&#8221; and FJM</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/</link>
	<description>Exploring the soft underbelly of sports</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Local Quipster</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41903</link>
		<dc:creator>Local Quipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41903</guid>
		<description>The Office is good, but it reminds me of the Simpsons in the early years. It focuses too much on Michael just like the Simpsons had too much Bart and it got tired. They switched the main guy to Homer and it's still on. Similarly, the Office needs more Dwight. But I love it anyway, and what do I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office is good, but it reminds me of the Simpsons in the early years. It focuses too much on Michael just like the Simpsons had too much Bart and it got tired. They switched the main guy to Homer and it&#8217;s still on. Similarly, the Office needs more Dwight. But I love it anyway, and what do I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rand</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41887</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41887</guid>
		<description>done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41886</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41886</guid>
		<description>Joker: it does seem a bit unfair.  Like S.U. Perrookie said, watch 'em both.  And read Fire Joe Morgan, too.  I think Rand should add it to the blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joker: it does seem a bit unfair.  Like S.U. Perrookie said, watch &#8216;em both.  And read Fire Joe Morgan, too.  I think Rand should add it to the blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41885</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41885</guid>
		<description>More Cowbell would be good too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Cowbell would be good too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hootie</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41884</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hootie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41884</guid>
		<description>@ Joker- Totally true.

I think The Office has largely thrived because of the first season.  It's still good, but 30 Rock wins.  

I'm getting kind of sick of Michael's schtick. I'll take Jim messing with Dwight 9 times out of 10 over more of Michael being a clueless dolt.  Less Andy = better as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Joker- Totally true.</p>
<p>I think The Office has largely thrived because of the first season.  It&#8217;s still good, but 30 Rock wins.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting kind of sick of Michael&#8217;s schtick. I&#8217;ll take Jim messing with Dwight 9 times out of 10 over more of Michael being a clueless dolt.  Less Andy = better as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joker</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41883</link>
		<dc:creator>Joker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41883</guid>
		<description>It's pretty amazing that Rand get's to interview one of the writers of the Office, yet everyone talks about how much better 30 Rock is than than the Office...which is totally true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty amazing that Rand get&#8217;s to interview one of the writers of the Office, yet everyone talks about how much better 30 Rock is than than the Office&#8230;which is totally true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Rookie</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41882</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Rookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41882</guid>
		<description>We don't need Fasola Matt and Stu to have a party. We will always have PPP to keep us company in the winter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t need Fasola Matt and Stu to have a party. We will always have PPP to keep us company in the winter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41881</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41881</guid>
		<description>Broderick was pretty good on last nights episode. "I wasn't even eating a burger, it was a sandwich..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broderick was pretty good on last nights episode. &#8220;I wasn&#8217;t even eating a burger, it was a sandwich&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hootie</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41880</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hootie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41880</guid>
		<description>Dangit, I am now regretting turning the TV off after The Office last night.  

Does that hulu service work pretty well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dangit, I am now regretting turning the TV off after The Office last night.  </p>
<p>Does that hulu service work pretty well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joker</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41879</link>
		<dc:creator>Joker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/05/09/randball-qa-michael-schur-of-the-office-and-fjm/#comment-41879</guid>
		<description>That burrito before sex thing is totally true, unless you want her to get up and leave right after...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That burrito before sex thing is totally true, unless you want her to get up and leave right after&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
