Tuesday (Big Brown ugliness) edition: Wha’ Happened?
Posted on June 10th, 2008 – 8:49 AMBy Michael Rand
Saturday was stunning. Sunday was silent. Monday, with no clear answer in sight as to why Big Brown didn’t dominate the Belmont Stakes, speculation turned wild and statements turned ugly. Jockey Kent Desormeaux said it was likely a slow start out of the gate that doomed Big Brown, among other things — perhaps the most palatable and practical explanation. But he also said trainer Rick Dutrow wasn’t blaming the ride. Ruh-roh. Dutrow did exactly that. Others grasping for answers as to how a horse that looked so dominant could look so bad have theories about steroids and race-fixing (comments), the latter based on the nature of the crowd that hangs around Big Brown and some of the betting patterns Saturday.. The answer we’re going with: sometimes the best don’t perform their best. But folks like Dutrow would rather assign blame.
Here’s what Dutrow had to say:
Dutrow said he’s been unable to find anything physically wrong with Big Brown. He said the quarter crack on the colt’s left front hoof was fine and that he showed no signs of being sore. Desormeaux eased up Big Brown with a quarter-mile remaining in the race, won by 38-1 long shot Da’ Tara.
“I don’t know why he had to do that,” said Dutrow, who questioned Desormeaux’s decisions in the race.
Entering the first turn, Desormeaux took a hard hold of Big Brown and yanked him to the outside, bumping with Anak Nakal before finding running room outside of Tale of Ekati while Da’ Tara opened up a three-length lead around the clubhouse turn.
“I’m sure he didn’t have any idea what the hell was going on going into the first turn the way [Desormeaux] was switching him all over the damn track,” Dutrow said. “I don’t know what he was doing.”
That was after the jockey had told Dan Patrick the following:
DP: So, two races that you know of that they’ll race him, are you going to be the jockey for those two races?
KD: Yes I will, Dan. There’s definitely no one pointing a finger in my direction. In fact, I’ve been complimented by the trainer and the owner. Believe me, I was spanking on him, encouraging him to run until I was last. Icabad Crane came inside me, bumped me out of the way, and proceeded on his endeavor to win the race, but at that point I was already like seventh and backing up fast.
It’s all very sad, really. One of the worst traits in a human being — one that has unfortunately become more prevalent in a society that often seems more interested in avoiding mistakes than taking a chance on greatness — is the need to assign blame. Dutrow said, “I feel like a loser,” which is appropriate, though not in the context he’s describing. The heat, the cracked hoof that slowed down training, the stumble, the track: all small pieces that could have been overcome but added up to a great horse not having his best day. Like a pitcher without his best stuff, a quarterback missing reads and a goalie fighting the puck, a team (cough) giving up 40 runs ina four-game series, it happens. Lest we join the conspiracy theorists and connect the dots between Dutrow and hubris, let’s just say it wasn’t Big Brown’s day and leave it at that.
Fasola-link! Hoc-key?
16 Responses to "Tuesday (Big Brown ugliness) edition: Wha’ Happened?"
It’s kind of like an NFL team giving up 41 points in an NFC playoff game, while not scoring.
Thank you for conveniently ignoring more discussion of the Twins’ futility.
Any predictions for Spain-Russia today? (I know…soc-cer?)
You want my name on your stadium? I don’t think so. At least not unless you let me make all decisions.
Hairy, bad sweater-wearing Timberwolves Prez Kevin McHale doesn’t see what all the fuss is all about.
“We’ve been pulling up in the middle of the race for years,” said McLuvin.
Maybe Kent Desormeaux and Tim Donaghy can share a cell.
Here’s a crazy question. I realize people don’t care much about track & field or running unless it’s the Olympics. What exactly makes horse racing so exciting then? I’m sure the gambling and boozing at the events are a part of it. Otherwise, people just really like horses I guess. Thoughts?
roughkat
here is your answer (if it’s nature, it’s ok to show on here)
I have decided that I am going to spend the rest of the day (and perhaps week) engaged in a faux feud with Stu. Please note that this “feud” is purely FICTIONAL and merely for MY OWN AMUSEMENT. Truth is, I think that Stu is the highest functioning of all of us Randballaholics. That being noted…
Both Rick Dutrow and Stu remind me of a big brown pile of [redacted}.
A fictional domestic dispute within the Ranball household?
I’m going to try and quietly play with my coloring books in the corner and not pick any sides. When you two drink and fight it makes me sad. But at some point I’m going to have to decide who I will fictionally move in with if you two get a fictional Randball divorce.
I’m picking Rocket’s side. He’s written a book so right away he has Buzz Bissinger on his side. All Stu has done is commented about his Big Daddy’s Bawls.
Stu - Time to start thinking about moving out of you parents’ place.
roughkat
That is a good point. In said divorce, who is going to get who’s parents basement in the settlement? How will they split up the COW trophies since Stu has more? Will Stu be entitled half of the earnings of Rocket’s book? (which will only account to 3 trips to 5 Guys)
Did anyone think that this trainer Dutrow would NOT be throwing his jock under the bus?
The choice is easy–I don’t remembering seeing Rocket in these parts for some time (never mind my own absences), while Stu continues to give day in, day out.
Of course, I suppose that means that Stu will owe Rocket some sort of monthly Cheeto support…
Truth is, I think that Stu is the highest functioning of all of us Randballaholics.
“High-functioning” make Stu sound like he’s autistic.
I’m just narcissistic enough to love this, for the record.
