<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles Barkley playing poker: what could go wrong?</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/06/20/charles-barkley-playing-poker-what-could-go-wrong/</link>
	<description>Exploring the soft underbelly of sports</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/06/20/charles-barkley-playing-poker-what-could-go-wrong/#comment-44105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/06/20/charles-barkley-playing-poker-what-could-go-wrong/#comment-44105</guid>
		<description>Charles Barkley: The Sidney Ponson of gambling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Barkley: The Sidney Ponson of gambling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/06/20/charles-barkley-playing-poker-what-could-go-wrong/#comment-44100</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/06/20/charles-barkley-playing-poker-what-could-go-wrong/#comment-44100</guid>
		<description>As long as John Daly is still throwing money around Chuck won't be the biggest loser in Vegas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as John Daly is still throwing money around Chuck won&#8217;t be the biggest loser in Vegas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/06/20/charles-barkley-playing-poker-what-could-go-wrong/#comment-44099</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/06/20/charles-barkley-playing-poker-what-could-go-wrong/#comment-44099</guid>
		<description>I don't know jack squat about addiction (except for you, Liquid Paper, with your tantalizing odor, ohmigod just one sniff is all I--HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUFF--oh, yeah, I mean, wow...god, I'm so weak, so weak, WHO'S GOING TO LOVE YOU NOW, WHORE?), but I have to imagine this is comparable to the "one glass of wine with dinner" or "only smoke when I'm at the bar" reasoning.  Granted, it's the most altruistic possible way to reason yourself back to a bad habit, but couldn't he just cut them a check?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know jack squat about addiction (except for you, Liquid Paper, with your tantalizing odor, ohmigod just one sniff is all I&#8211;HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUFF&#8211;oh, yeah, I mean, wow&#8230;god, I&#8217;m so weak, so weak, WHO&#8217;S GOING TO LOVE YOU NOW, WHORE?), but I have to imagine this is comparable to the &#8220;one glass of wine with dinner&#8221; or &#8220;only smoke when I&#8217;m at the bar&#8221; reasoning.  Granted, it&#8217;s the most altruistic possible way to reason yourself back to a bad habit, but couldn&#8217;t he just cut them a check?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
