<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday (Ricky over Brett) edition: Wha&#8217; Happened?</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/</link>
	<description>Exploring the soft underbelly of sports</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46689</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46689</guid>
		<description>Those two could star in the new Odd Couple. 

MM: Rick, did you drink my milk?
RD: Am I suppose to put water on my cereal? 
MM: My mom sent me cookies and now we have no milk!
RD: [Redacted] off. And give me those cookies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those two could star in the new Odd Couple. </p>
<p>MM: Rick, did you drink my milk?<br />
RD: Am I suppose to put water on my cereal?<br />
MM: My mom sent me cookies and now we have no milk!<br />
RD: [Redacted] off. And give me those cookies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46688</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46688</guid>
		<description>Not only was Madsen suprised that (D)avis got signed, he couldn't believe that he was still under contract. FOR TWO MORE YEARS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only was Madsen suprised that (D)avis got signed, he couldn&#8217;t believe that he was still under contract. FOR TWO MORE YEARS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roughkat</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46686</link>
		<dc:creator>roughkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46686</guid>
		<description>What's the over/under on the number of triple doubles Davis will have against his own team this season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the over/under on the number of triple doubles Davis will have against his own team this season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StraightCashHomey</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46685</link>
		<dc:creator>StraightCashHomey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46685</guid>
		<description>Why is Mark Madsen with Andre 3000?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Mark Madsen with Andre 3000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46684</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46684</guid>
		<description>You squeezing Brett Favre into every storyline is making me sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You squeezing Brett Favre into every storyline is making me sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46683</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46683</guid>
		<description>RE: The Hawk.  If I can quote Brandon, "I support this trade in full if it will allow us to get rid of Adam Everett or Mike Lamb."

And if Rick Anderson can make him look like he looked the last time he was a Twin, I say we buy him a nice steak dinner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: The Hawk.  If I can quote Brandon, &#8220;I support this trade in full if it will allow us to get rid of Adam Everett or Mike Lamb.&#8221;</p>
<p>And if Rick Anderson can make him look like he looked the last time he was a Twin, I say we buy him a nice steak dinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roughkat</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46682</link>
		<dc:creator>roughkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46682</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ju75XsCO4o" rel="nofollow"&gt;Get ready for this jama.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ju75XsCO4o" rel="nofollow">Get ready for this jama.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave MN</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46681</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave MN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46681</guid>
		<description>Re: Beer stealing

The guy on the left looks like someone took a big, red [redacted] on his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Beer stealing</p>
<p>The guy on the left looks like someone took a big, red [redacted] on his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roughkat</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46680</link>
		<dc:creator>roughkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2008/07/29/tuesday-ricky-over-brett-edition-wha-happened/#comment-46680</guid>
		<description>If we insist on still talking about Baby Farvay then here we go...

Assumption #1: The Packers either believe that Aaron Rogers is the better QB (doubtful) or that it's time to start getting Rogers ready.  Given the latter, the Packers must be prepared for this to be more of a rebuilding year and they probably won't be making it back to the Conference Championship.

Assumption #2: The NFL is a business.  That's why it's time for the Packers to rid themselves of Farvay and begin to move on so that the franchise can shine in years to come.

So why the [redacted] does it matter who they trade to?  Why is it a business in once instance and a big ball of emotions and feelings the next?  TT wants it both ways.  Someone please explain to me rationally why the Packers can't trade inside the division this year.

That said, I don't want Farvay.  Let the Bears have him.  Then they can be the Baby Bears and the Muppet Babies can be their new theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we insist on still talking about Baby Farvay then here we go&#8230;</p>
<p>Assumption #1: The Packers either believe that Aaron Rogers is the better QB (doubtful) or that it&#8217;s time to start getting Rogers ready.  Given the latter, the Packers must be prepared for this to be more of a rebuilding year and they probably won&#8217;t be making it back to the Conference Championship.</p>
<p>Assumption #2: The NFL is a business.  That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s time for the Packers to rid themselves of Farvay and begin to move on so that the franchise can shine in years to come.</p>
<p>So why the [redacted] does it matter who they trade to?  Why is it a business in once instance and a big ball of emotions and feelings the next?  TT wants it both ways.  Someone please explain to me rationally why the Packers can&#8217;t trade inside the division this year.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t want Farvay.  Let the Bears have him.  Then they can be the Baby Bears and the Muppet Babies can be their new theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
