<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Vikings and the QB position: a retrospective</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/</link>
	<description>Exploring the soft underbelly of sports</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Merx</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58677</link>
		<dc:creator>Merx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58677</guid>
		<description>"We don't even have the heart to see how many different quarterbacks have startedthose playoff games." 

8 or 9 unsure of who started the 90 playoff game but Gannon, Wilson and Kramer each attempted at least 17 passes during the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t even have the heart to see how many different quarterbacks have startedthose playoff games.&#8221; </p>
<p>8 or 9 unsure of who started the 90 playoff game but Gannon, Wilson and Kramer each attempted at least 17 passes during the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58676</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58676</guid>
		<description>What's going to kill me is that there's a decent chance that Tyler [redacted] Thigpen is going to be better than any of the quarterbacks on the Vikings roster next season.  

I'm not emotionally ready for that, I don't think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s going to kill me is that there&#8217;s a decent chance that Tyler [redacted] Thigpen is going to be better than any of the quarterbacks on the Vikings roster next season.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not emotionally ready for that, I don&#8217;t think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58675</link>
		<dc:creator>newbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58675</guid>
		<description>In addition to latte's question, is John David Booty the QB of the future?  I think T-Jack can be a good #2.  But that would mean we get a veteran free agent this off season and need to develop a young QB after he leaves.  Will that be Jackson?  I doubt it, but is it Booty?  Or do we have to draft a QB early.  (When we have so many other needs.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to latte&#8217;s question, is John David Booty the QB of the future?  I think T-Jack can be a good #2.  But that would mean we get a veteran free agent this off season and need to develop a young QB after he leaves.  Will that be Jackson?  I doubt it, but is it Booty?  Or do we have to draft a QB early.  (When we have so many other needs.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jama</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58674</link>
		<dc:creator>jama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58674</guid>
		<description>Newbie

You're going to have to get Joker to copy and paste that list. I drank those names out of my memory over the last several years. 

What would the Vikings success have been had they just signed Jeff Garcia as a Free Agent 2 years ago? He's my guess as the starting QB1 for week 1 next year with Jackson as QB2 with QB3 being filled by a 1st or 2nd round draft pick. (The Booty will get kicked to the curb)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newbie</p>
<p>You&#8217;re going to have to get Joker to copy and paste that list. I drank those names out of my memory over the last several years. </p>
<p>What would the Vikings success have been had they just signed Jeff Garcia as a Free Agent 2 years ago? He&#8217;s my guess as the starting QB1 for week 1 next year with Jackson as QB2 with QB3 being filled by a 1st or 2nd round draft pick. (The Booty will get kicked to the curb)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lattewarrior</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58673</link>
		<dc:creator>lattewarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58673</guid>
		<description>I hate my laptop keyboard. Dilfer's previous job was as an immobile, fumble-prone QB. And he also worked in janitorial.

My question is not whether or not the Vikings should seek out a better QB1 option next season (I think we're all in agreement that they *should*), but rather has T-Jack shown enough potential as a project to be a viable QB2 in a league that requires any team with playoff aspirations to have two viable QB options on its roster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate my laptop keyboard. Dilfer&#8217;s previous job was as an immobile, fumble-prone QB. And he also worked in janitorial.</p>
<p>My question is not whether or not the Vikings should seek out a better QB1 option next season (I think we&#8217;re all in agreement that they *should*), but rather has T-Jack shown enough potential as a project to be a viable QB2 in a league that requires any team with playoff aspirations to have two viable QB options on its roster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lattewarrior</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58672</link>
		<dc:creator>lattewarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58672</guid>
		<description>Trent Dilfer has a ring but there's no questioning that he's better at his current job (engaging talking head) than his previous job (immobile, fumble-prone).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent Dilfer has a ring but there&#8217;s no questioning that he&#8217;s better at his current job (engaging talking head) than his previous job (immobile, fumble-prone).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joker</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58669</link>
		<dc:creator>Joker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58669</guid>
		<description>Think we can talk Trent Dilfer out of retirement?  I mean come on...he won a superbowl...and was cut from the team the next day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think we can talk Trent Dilfer out of retirement?  I mean come on&#8230;he won a superbowl&#8230;and was cut from the team the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58668</link>
		<dc:creator>newbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/randball/2009/01/06/the-vikings-and-the-qb-position-a-retrospective/#comment-58668</guid>
		<description>At least those were some good names at QB, cue jama's rebuttal list in 3...2...1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least those were some good names at QB, cue jama&#8217;s rebuttal list in 3&#8230;2&#8230;1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
