<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Roadguy</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy</link>
	<description>Travel along with our transportation geek</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Roadguy&#8217;s blog is getting a new look, new address by Prof. S.</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/31/roadguys-blog-is-getting-a-new-look-new-address/#comment-17393</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof. S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/31/roadguys-blog-is-getting-a-new-look-new-address/#comment-17393</guid>
		<description>NO!!!!!!  The new page sucks.  It sucks A LOT!

First - my current name, well, that's got to go because it has spaces and punctuation.  

Second, I have a very sneaky suspicion that we will be clicking though 27 pages of posts so the Strib can crank up its website hits, just as it does with stories.  Screw that.  I'm bored with the 4 comments per page spread across 27 pages.

Third, bored with the like/don't like options and hope that doesn't come around.  It's only good to get an idea whether conservatives or liberals are reading any given story.

Roadguy, it's been a nice run, but I'm betting that I'll be checking out soon.  Too bad since it's the only redeeming quality of this website.  Looks like &lt;a href="http://www.twincities.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pioneer Press&lt;/a&gt; here I come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO!!!!!!  The new page sucks.  It sucks A LOT!</p>
<p>First - my current name, well, that&#8217;s got to go because it has spaces and punctuation.  </p>
<p>Second, I have a very sneaky suspicion that we will be clicking though 27 pages of posts so the Strib can crank up its website hits, just as it does with stories.  Screw that.  I&#8217;m bored with the 4 comments per page spread across 27 pages.</p>
<p>Third, bored with the like/don&#8217;t like options and hope that doesn&#8217;t come around.  It&#8217;s only good to get an idea whether conservatives or liberals are reading any given story.</p>
<p>Roadguy, it&#8217;s been a nice run, but I&#8217;m betting that I&#8217;ll be checking out soon.  Too bad since it&#8217;s the only redeeming quality of this website.  Looks like <a href="http://www.twincities.com" rel="nofollow">Pioneer Press</a> here I come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dusty gravel roads of &#8230; Minneapolis by botski</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17392</link>
		<dc:creator>botski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17392</guid>
		<description>"stone chips / tar on my car wah wah wah..."

Cool to know that there is a good chance that while riding my bike on sealcoat, certain DBaGs won't be out harrassing me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;stone chips / tar on my car wah wah wah&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Cool to know that there is a good chance that while riding my bike on sealcoat, certain DBaGs won&#8217;t be out harrassing me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The move is official by Ry4an</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/08/03/the-move-is-official/#comment-17391</link>
		<dc:creator>Ry4an</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/08/03/the-move-is-official/#comment-17391</guid>
		<description>Correction: web persons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction: web persons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The move is official by Ry4an</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/08/03/the-move-is-official/#comment-17390</link>
		<dc:creator>Ry4an</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/08/03/the-move-is-official/#comment-17390</guid>
		<description>Your web guys should use a RewriteRule instead of a Redirect.  No one site of note has had .html in their (post-redirect) URLs since the 1990s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your web guys should use a RewriteRule instead of a Redirect.  No one site of note has had .html in their (post-redirect) URLs since the 1990s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roadguy&#8217;s blog is getting a new look, new address by Pete</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/31/roadguys-blog-is-getting-a-new-look-new-address/#comment-17389</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/31/roadguys-blog-is-getting-a-new-look-new-address/#comment-17389</guid>
		<description>While I understand and appreciate people's desire for anonymity while posting online, I wish there was a stricter policy for users.  There are a fair number of reasonably intelligent posters who often provide useful and insightful comments on any given subject.  But there seem to be more who simply enjoy cutting down the opinions (or more often the people) they don't agree with.  I'm not afraid of disagreement or healthy debate, but I find it difficult to take seriously any guerilla-style comments from someone with an idiotic username.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I understand and appreciate people&#8217;s desire for anonymity while posting online, I wish there was a stricter policy for users.  There are a fair number of reasonably intelligent posters who often provide useful and insightful comments on any given subject.  But there seem to be more who simply enjoy cutting down the opinions (or more often the people) they don&#8217;t agree with.  I&#8217;m not afraid of disagreement or healthy debate, but I find it difficult to take seriously any guerilla-style comments from someone with an idiotic username.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dusty gravel roads of &#8230; Minneapolis by Prof. S.</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17388</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof. S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17388</guid>
		<description>Matty, there are &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; advantages of having slower vehicles there.  I've never heard of even a single person ever actually being hit around here.  It's not like this is some danger zone.

And it's &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; more pleasant to visit the area via walking because half the sidewalks are closed, you are forced to walk through a lot of dusty, dirty roads, and car movements are less predictable.

If you talk to businesses, one of the big disincentives for people to come downtown is driving and parking.  They drive out to the suburbs because they don't think they can park downtown.  If you want a thriving downtown, you need to encourage vehicle traffic.  I'm not saying that it should only be cars - light rail, buses and bikes are good too.

But let's be honest, if you're a retailer, your key market is not people on public transit and bikes.  It's people in big cars.  I'm willing to be $1,000 that nobody has ever bought an expensive designer dress from Saks or Neimen Marcus and brought it home on a bike or public transit.  I mean, let's be honest here.

You need to make it easy for people to get to the core.  Sure, they should walk when they're down there, but you need to get people there first.  Until you make that easier, the downtown retail will continue to lose to the suburban malls.

Your argument is far more utopia than practical reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matty, there are <i>no</i> advantages of having slower vehicles there.  I&#8217;ve never heard of even a single person ever actually being hit around here.  It&#8217;s not like this is some danger zone.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s <i>not</i> more pleasant to visit the area via walking because half the sidewalks are closed, you are forced to walk through a lot of dusty, dirty roads, and car movements are less predictable.</p>
<p>If you talk to businesses, one of the big disincentives for people to come downtown is driving and parking.  They drive out to the suburbs because they don&#8217;t think they can park downtown.  If you want a thriving downtown, you need to encourage vehicle traffic.  I&#8217;m not saying that it should only be cars - light rail, buses and bikes are good too.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s be honest, if you&#8217;re a retailer, your key market is not people on public transit and bikes.  It&#8217;s people in big cars.  I&#8217;m willing to be $1,000 that nobody has ever bought an expensive designer dress from Saks or Neimen Marcus and brought it home on a bike or public transit.  I mean, let&#8217;s be honest here.</p>
<p>You need to make it easy for people to get to the core.  Sure, they should walk when they&#8217;re down there, but you need to get people there first.  Until you make that easier, the downtown retail will continue to lose to the suburban malls.</p>
<p>Your argument is far more utopia than practical reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dusty gravel roads of &#8230; Minneapolis by KarlB</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17387</link>
		<dc:creator>KarlB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17387</guid>
		<description>In that second photo, is that woman even heeding to that pickup truck she's about to run into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that second photo, is that woman even heeding to that pickup truck she&#8217;s about to run into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roadguy&#8217;s blog is getting a new look, new address by Tony Toews</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/31/roadguys-blog-is-getting-a-new-look-new-address/#comment-17386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Toews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/31/roadguys-blog-is-getting-a-new-look-new-address/#comment-17386</guid>
		<description>Geez, another frigging login.  I'm sooo tired of remembering all that I likely won't be bothered to to subscribe let alone reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, another frigging login.  I&#8217;m sooo tired of remembering all that I likely won&#8217;t be bothered to to subscribe let alone reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dusty gravel roads of &#8230; Minneapolis by Suz</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17384</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17384</guid>
		<description>JDS - You are correct. It also retards oxidative aging of the pavement and improves the skid resistance, especially when the pavement is wet. 

DGB - Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2009 Paper #09-2104 "Evaluation of Seal Coat Performance by Using Macrotexture Measurements"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDS - You are correct. It also retards oxidative aging of the pavement and improves the skid resistance, especially when the pavement is wet. </p>
<p>DGB - Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2009 Paper #09-2104 &#8220;Evaluation of Seal Coat Performance by Using Macrotexture Measurements&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The dusty gravel roads of &#8230; Minneapolis by Matty</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17383</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/roadguy/2009/07/29/the-dusty-gravel-roads-of-minneapolis/#comment-17383</guid>
		<description>Prof. - you bring up legitimate points.  The Marq2 construction does make it more difficult to move around the area in a private motor vehicle.  That fact needs to be weighed against the benefits realized by having fewer and slower moving motor vehicles in the area.  

For example, while people are discouraged from driving motor vehicles to businesses in the area, it is much more pleasant to visit the area via walking, biking and transit due to the decrease in auto traffic.  Along these lines, if we were to make a permanent disincentive to drive private vehicles into the heart of the central business district downtown we would see businesses thriving and travel time with the core significantly improved because there would be fewer tips in private motor vehicles, which is the most inefficient mode of transport for short trips within a dense central business district like downtown Minneapolis.  

We're better off all around with fewer cars plugging up our streets.  Discouraging people from bringing their cars into downtown helps free up space for everyone and would be a positive tradeoff in my estimation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof. - you bring up legitimate points.  The Marq2 construction does make it more difficult to move around the area in a private motor vehicle.  That fact needs to be weighed against the benefits realized by having fewer and slower moving motor vehicles in the area.  </p>
<p>For example, while people are discouraged from driving motor vehicles to businesses in the area, it is much more pleasant to visit the area via walking, biking and transit due to the decrease in auto traffic.  Along these lines, if we were to make a permanent disincentive to drive private vehicles into the heart of the central business district downtown we would see businesses thriving and travel time with the core significantly improved because there would be fewer tips in private motor vehicles, which is the most inefficient mode of transport for short trips within a dense central business district like downtown Minneapolis.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;re better off all around with fewer cars plugging up our streets.  Discouraging people from bringing their cars into downtown helps free up space for everyone and would be a positive tradeoff in my estimation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.381 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-07 18:16:34 -->
