Seat belt math: When does $25 equal $100-plus?
Posted on July 12th, 2009 – 11:13 PMBy Roadguy
Here’s my weekly column:
ABOUT THAT FINE FOR NOT BUCKLING UP…
When the state’s new seat belt law passed this year, it included a $25 fine, but alert reader Paul is among those who have discovered the real cost.
After he got cited in Roseville for failing to buckle up, he called the court system to get more information and the person on the other end of the phone told him what he’d actually be paying:
106 bucks! I told her online it said it was a 25-buck ticket, but she said there were $81 in surcharges!
Roadguy checked with Susan Bownes, Ramsey County’s traffic violations manager. The voice on the other end of Paul’s call was correct.
Although they’re often thought of as court fees, the surcharges mostly go into state coffers. In Ramsey County, $75 of the $81 goes into the state general fund, $5 goes to running the county’s law library, and a dollar goes to the county itself. Hennepin County violators pay slightly less — $78 in surcharges — because the library fee is $3, and there’s no county fee.
On the (somewhat) brighter side for misbehaving drivers, there’s now only one surcharge per incident, instead of for every violation. That means if Paul had been ticketed for speeding and not being buckled up, he would’ve been hit with the surcharge once instead of twice. (That’s a recent change, Bownes said.)
If you ask Roadguy, it’s just a lot easier to wear the seat belt.
TWO VIEWS OF CLEAR BARRIERS

Last week I mentioned the new see-through sound barriers on Interstate 35W at Minnehaha Creek (slightly blurry photo above taken Friday by yours truly while sitting in the passenger seat), and a couple of readers made some noise of their own.
Alert reader Janet wanted to know whether such a barrier could be erected in Robbinsdale along Hwy. 100 at a spot where some residents objected to a solid wall that would have blocked their view of a lake. I called our friends at the Minnesota Department of Transportation, who indicated that the clear barriers are too expensive for widespread use, but they said they’d be happy to hear Janet out.
Alert reader Jim, meanwhile, questions the value of such barriers for drivers:
You don’t want people looking down. … Beautification is beautiful, but let’s use the freeways as intended, as thoroughfares without having a parkway effect so that people can look at all the shrubbery and the greenery … Keep the distractions away from people and we’ll have less claims for the insurance companies.
So if the acrylic gets obscured with crud in the winter, not everyone will be disappointed.







