<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The baseball diaries</title>
	<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/</link>
	<description>An expert fan's perspective on what's happening on and off the field</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: romer</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10845</link>
		<dc:creator>romer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10845</guid>
		<description>I've been saying that May 12th is the day to assess.

As it turns out, the Twins are on pace to win 88 games. That seems about right to me.

Player assessment, position by position, is always going on. So I'd just stay with a team-wide assessment.

Besides the extensive weakness of offensive power, the only other weakness looming is the bullpen --- because of Neshek's exit.*

I don't think the Twins are over-achieving this year. And I think they can compete with all teams.

I'm not expecting them to make the post-season, but they have a decent chance.

For this year -- and for the years to come -- they must find a better SS and a power-hitting 3B to improve their chances.

But I don't see that happening this year.

If and when Baker and Liriano return and are lights out, then they could become the favorite for the wild card this year.

If the Twins make a surprise trade or two, that could tip the Central-Division balance too.

So, assuming no injury epidemic, looks like 88 wins.

*(I really don't see any other weaknesses --- not their youth, starting pitching, hitting, fundamentals, defense, lineup as a whole, the bench, management, or front office. Sure, there is lack of strength in some of these areas, but nothing like last year's holes at 3B and DH and/or LF.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying that May 12th is the day to assess.</p>
<p>As it turns out, the Twins are on pace to win 88 games. That seems about right to me.</p>
<p>Player assessment, position by position, is always going on. So I&#8217;d just stay with a team-wide assessment.</p>
<p>Besides the extensive weakness of offensive power, the only other weakness looming is the bullpen &#8212; because of Neshek&#8217;s exit.*</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the Twins are over-achieving this year. And I think they can compete with all teams.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not expecting them to make the post-season, but they have a decent chance.</p>
<p>For this year &#8212; and for the years to come &#8212; they must find a better SS and a power-hitting 3B to improve their chances.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t see that happening this year.</p>
<p>If and when Baker and Liriano return and are lights out, then they could become the favorite for the wild card this year.</p>
<p>If the Twins make a surprise trade or two, that could tip the Central-Division balance too.</p>
<p>So, assuming no injury epidemic, looks like 88 wins.</p>
<p>*(I really don&#8217;t see any other weaknesses &#8212; not their youth, starting pitching, hitting, fundamentals, defense, lineup as a whole, the bench, management, or front office. Sure, there is lack of strength in some of these areas, but nothing like last year&#8217;s holes at 3B and DH and/or LF.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask Kleiner</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10844</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask Kleiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10844</guid>
		<description>Chevy Chase: Weekend Update recognizes its obligation to present responsible opposing viewpoints to our editorials. Here to reply to a recent editorial, is Emily Litella.

Emily Litella: I'm here tonight to speak out against busting schoolchildren. Busting schoolchildren is a terrible, terrible thing. I hear this is going on all over the country. Mean policemen arrest little children and put them in jail in the wrong neighborhood, so they can't even play with their little friends. Imagine, busting schoolchildren! The food in jail isn't good, and even though they get bread, I don't believe they can get toast. Or nice cake. Now, who will tuck them in? Where will they hang their leggings? Where will they set up their little lemonade stands? Well, they don't have toys in jail, except maybe..

Chevy Chase: [ interrupting ] Miss Litella?

Emily Litella: Yes?

Chevy Chase: I'm sorry. The editorial was on bussing schoolchildren. Bussing. Not busting.

Emily Litella: Oh. I'm sorry. Never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chevy Chase: Weekend Update recognizes its obligation to present responsible opposing viewpoints to our editorials. Here to reply to a recent editorial, is Emily Litella.</p>
<p>Emily Litella: I&#8217;m here tonight to speak out against busting schoolchildren. Busting schoolchildren is a terrible, terrible thing. I hear this is going on all over the country. Mean policemen arrest little children and put them in jail in the wrong neighborhood, so they can&#8217;t even play with their little friends. Imagine, busting schoolchildren! The food in jail isn&#8217;t good, and even though they get bread, I don&#8217;t believe they can get toast. Or nice cake. Now, who will tuck them in? Where will they hang their leggings? Where will they set up their little lemonade stands? Well, they don&#8217;t have toys in jail, except maybe..</p>
<p>Chevy Chase: [ interrupting ] Miss Litella?</p>
<p>Emily Litella: Yes?</p>
<p>Chevy Chase: I&#8217;m sorry. The editorial was on bussing schoolchildren. Bussing. Not busting.</p>
<p>Emily Litella: Oh. I&#8217;m sorry. Never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapitalBabs</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10843</link>
		<dc:creator>CapitalBabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10843</guid>
		<description>You said it Ben!!  I love me some Twitchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said it Ben!!  I love me some Twitchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeWalsh</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10842</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeWalsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10842</guid>
		<description>Howard, you've been on a roll lately. Keep up the great work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard, you&#8217;ve been on a roll lately. Keep up the great work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sane</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10841</link>
		<dc:creator>sane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10841</guid>
		<description>Christina,
There is no reason for you to feel bad.
If I had a nickel for everytime I have read a post on these blogs and thought "Are they serious?", I would be posting from my mansion in Acapulco.

And then after thinking about what I'd read, I would decide the writer was serious (or not).
Then find out later I was ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!!! 
NOT EVEN CLOSE!!!!!!
Christina, join us other fools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina,<br />
There is no reason for you to feel bad.<br />
If I had a nickel for everytime I have read a post on these blogs and thought &#8220;Are they serious?&#8221;, I would be posting from my mansion in Acapulco.</p>
<p>And then after thinking about what I&#8217;d read, I would decide the writer was serious (or not).<br />
Then find out later I was ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!!!<br />
NOT EVEN CLOSE!!!!!!<br />
Christina, join us other fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SethSpeaks</title>
		<link>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10840</link>
		<dc:creator>SethSpeaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs2.startribune.com/blogs/sinker/2008/05/11/the-baseball-diaries/#comment-10840</guid>
		<description>Jason - Obviously those off field things I referenced in regard to Mauer have nothing to do with baseball. My point was just that he is a star based on all of his on-field success. The other stuff is what gives him the 'star quality' that takes it to the next level. I don't think anyone here is dumb enough to think that being nice or having sideburns has anything to do with baseball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason - Obviously those off field things I referenced in regard to Mauer have nothing to do with baseball. My point was just that he is a star based on all of his on-field success. The other stuff is what gives him the &#8217;star quality&#8217; that takes it to the next level. I don&#8217;t think anyone here is dumb enough to think that being nice or having sideburns has anything to do with baseball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
