StarTribune.com

Dead grass not the taxpayers’ burden

Posted on June 2nd, 2008 – 9:18 AM
By James Shiffer

From our Minneapolis beat reporter and incurable runner, Steve Brandt:

We’re glad to report that the bad news isn’t even worse when it comes to the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board’s attempts at laying sod alongside those newly paved W. River Parkway paths we like to run on north of Plymouth Avenue.

The bad news is that there’s lots of dead grass. The good news is that it’s being replaced, and not on the public dime.

deadgrass.jpgLet’s go back to late last fall. As the weather dialed down below freezing, awful late for much growth, runners noticed sod being unrolled along the paths. We made a mental note to check on its survival when the winter passed.

Sure enough. As the sun warmed and dandelions sprouted, substantial portions of the sod remained a dull dun. Even worse, substantial segments of the sod lining the paths had been torn loose over the winter by plows clearing the paths. This stretched intermittently from Plymouth Avenue north to the new trails’ terminus just short of the Burlington Northern bridge, including dead and missing sections in front of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board’s headquarters.

This week, crews started replacing the casualties. But according to Park Board project manager Nick Eoloff, the cost is on the contractor, rather than the public.

“You never know what the weather’s going to be like,” he said, noting that the contractor’s work dragged in at times last summer, and the Park Board would have preferred to have the project sodded in September. Sod that was laid earlier survived better. “We wanted it down. We wanted it buttoned up.”

Sodding last fall along the paths did provide the advantage of keeping soil from areas that were seeded rather than sodded from washing onto the paths during this spring’s rains. Some of the seeded areas are faring better than some sodded areas.

Eoloff is hoping for good germination later in the spring for prairie grasses that were seeded, especially south of Broadway between the river and walking path, to stabilize the shoreline. Those need warmer temperatures to germinate and their success will depend on the next few weeks of weather.

Meanwhile, we’re enjoying the paths.

4 Responses to “Dead grass not the taxpayers’ burden”

  1. Robert Grant Says:

    May 30th, 2008 at 9:21 am

    Robert Grant says:

    May 28th, 2008 at 9:04 am

    James,

    Jeff Shelman and Steve Brandt ran a story May 23 regarding “North side forclosure pends lives.”

    What do you suppose Mr. Jeffers is referring to concerning “his money?”

    Shouldn’t he have said the taxpayers money?

    Tenant Thomas Jeffers said residents were unprepared. “We were under the impression that we were staying. We have no money. We get money once a month. It’s near the end of the month, and we’re stuck with no money.”

    James,

    Did you follow the money Mr. Jeffers is referring to?

    James,

    Grass or crack?

  2. mnmike Says:

    Mr. Grant,

    Instead of littering up these blogs with your non-topic posts & librul bias rants, I suggest you send these questions in an email to the reporter.

  3. nick Says:

    Robert Grant, your comment makes no sense.

  4. Eric James Says:

    And… in other news, plants are blooming along East River Road!

    In regards to the sodding issue, I think it’s a problem everywhere. When our house was finally built in Burnsville, it took them weeks to finally sod the lawn and by then we crossed our fingers it would survive into Fall. All the sod along a hilly edge naturally died off from water draining away, not that the job was done well to begin with. And then last summer my work finally got the city special district to command-by-threat-of-death-squad that the contractor in charge sod a portion of Nicollet Avenue side street sidewalks. Of course a useless endeavor it was as we see now it’s all yellow and smushed by feet and people who think locking their bike up to a tree seedling is a good idea.

    But of course, in the end it’s really up to the public to care for these public “amenities” unless Mpls adopts suburban-style government services–hanging flower baskets on lamp posts and watering boulevard lawns daily with firehoses. A neighbor should get the idea to be the official seeder and waterer and kindly “charge” everyone a dollar.

Leave a Reply