StarTribune.com

Voting in Minnesota doesn’t look clean to this group

Posted on November 17th, 2008 – 1:25 PM
By James Shiffer

Election Day 2008 went smoothly with only isolated problems, according to the Minnesota Secretary of State’s office, and voter advocates who were monitoring the polls. Yet the potential for “irregularities” at the polls has taken an outsized significance this year, given the near-tie and upcoming recount in the U.S. Senate race. The group Minnesota Majority now wants the Justice Department to investigate potential voter fraud in Minnesota, my colleague Kevin Duchschere reports. A key point raised by this group is one that created quite a spirited debate on this blog - that registered voters don’t have show photo identification before picking up a ballot.

I’ll be curious to see the resolution of the group’s Data Practices Act requests for records related to “registration procedures, such as verification postcards returned as ‘undeliverable’ and voters who may have been challenged at the polls before voting.”

One Response to “Voting in Minnesota doesn’t look clean to this group”

  1. Nicole Says:

    When I voted, no I.D. was required to prove I was whom I claimed to be. The only requirement was a signature next to my printed name in a log book. Anyone could have walked in, claiming to be me, and voted in my name. There was no way to protect my vote. When I inquired on the lack of security, I was pooh-poohed away.
    No requirement of a form of identification makes it effortless for voter fraud.

    I voted at Garden City Elementary School located in Brooklyn Center, MN. I have heard that other locations required an I.D. I am hoping that Garden City was an isolated incident, however I doubt it.

Leave a Reply