Recently, the wife of my colleague Curt Brown received a letter from “Direct Processing Ltd” at their St. Paul home. The letter came with a realistic check, and an enticing letter, offering a $75,000 windfall.
“Your name was selected through a random ballot system through the use of your Credit/Debit card at participating outlets,” it said.
Depending on whether you go by the address on the letter or the one on the accompanying check, Direct Processing Ltd. is located in an office building on Bay Street in Toronto or at Chicago’s 233 South Wacker Drive, otherwise known as the mighty Sears Tower. I couldn’t find listings for either.
“We have enclosed a certified check in the amount of $4,875 (FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE DOLLARS) which has been deducted from your winnings,” says the letter, from Christine Russo (Claims Department Manager). It’s supposedly drawn on an account with First Bank & Trust, a little town in east central Illinois.
But don’t cash that check, the letter instructs, until you dial the 800 number and talk to “claims agent Paul Moore.”
I couldn’t reach Moore on Friday, but I did talk to Terry Howard, president and CEO of First Bank & Trust in Paris, Illinois.
“That check’s bogus,” Howard said. “It does have our routing and transit number,” but other numbers on the check don’t add up. He said it’s the first he’d heard of this particular scam. “Certified,” then, is a better description of someone who falls for this scam than the check itself.
“When the tooth fairy shows up with his pink tutu and has a conversation with me, I’ll believe this check,” he told me.
Here’s some more information about fake sweepstakes scams and the consequences of cashing phony checks.
Learn more about RSS
December 21st, 2008 at 3:14 pm
What this article doesn’t talk about is what would happend if somone did cash the check? I also went to the site for phoney checks and it also does not write about it. In order to difer people fromnot falling into a scam the consequences should be
December 22nd, 2008 at 9:19 am
Good question. I imagine that if you tried to deposit it
in your own account, you might face some penalty, since it’s clearly not a real check.
December 22nd, 2008 at 10:20 am
Hi James,
It would be great if you looked into the approved salary increase by members of our Congress. I think they are largely resposible for our current situation, and I believe their approval rating is below 20%. This seems very offensive.
If you do some digging, It would be nice to know who approved what by candidate.
Thank you,
Deb
December 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 pm
The scam typically operates like this: When you call
the phone number, “Paul Moore” instructs you to
(1) deposit the check, and then (2) when the bank makes
a partial amount available to you (as all banks do in
this situation), to wire them some amount — say, $500
to cover taxes or processing fees or some such thing.
Eventually, your check bounces (as described in the
story above), and the bank will hold you responsible
for the amount that you wired.
December 24th, 2008 at 9:31 am
In addition, after the check bounces, it can allow the issuer to gain
access to the depositor’s account information.