Restless, radioactive and rolling down the road

Posted on February 20th, 2009 – 4:35 PM
By James Shiffer

In my experience, the public only gets glimpses the inner workings of the highly secretive nuclear power industry when something goes wrong. This week, we learned that pieces of radioactive rubbish are occasionally put on flatbed trucks and driven across the country. We also learned that, just as in boxes of cereal, contents can settle during shipping, although when that happened with a piece of radioactive rubbish from Xcel Energy’s Prairie Island plant, the company got a slap from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The problem, reported in the Red Wing Republican-Eagle, happened in October 2008. The Prairie Island nuclear plant on the Mississippi River near Red Wing needed to ship fuel sipping equipment, a device used to move spent nuclear fuel around in storage pools, to a disposal site in Waltz Mill, Pennsylvania. A fuel sipper is apparently a flat thing with cords coming out of it, and it’s shipped in a special box designed for low-level radioactive waste. A thicket of rules applies to the transport of this stuff, and that includes testing for any fugitive radiation. The rules are intended to keep passing drivers from inadvertently getting zapped with radiation as they drive by a truck - the nuclear equivalent of a stone falling off the back of a dumptruck into your windshield.

That didn’t happen in this case, possibly only by happenstance, since the villainous radioactive particle decided to settle on the bottom of the container, rather than the side. The unplanned cargo shift was discovered at the truck’s destination during a standard radiation test. The inadequately secured piece of trash had slipped inside the shipping box, NRC spokeswoman Victoria Mitlyng told me. The danger to the public was minimal, she said, even with the fugitive particle. If someone had crawled under the flatbed truck and lain there for a half hour, that person would have received the equivalent radiation of a chest X-ray, Mitlyng said.

Nevertheless, this is a no-no, as far as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is concerned, so it issued an enforcement action known as a “preliminary yellow” finding. Aside from the radioactive mishap, the NRC faulted the company for failing to train its workers properly so they would know how to package the dangerous material securely.

Mitlyng said nuclear plants typically send radioactive refuse on the road a couple of times each week. When I asked her if anyone has ever been dosed in this fashion, she said: “In the history of nuclear power in this country, we haven’t had incidents where a member of the public was overexposed to radiation, either in a nuclear power plant, like Three Mile Island, or in the transporting of nuclear material.”

Xcel Energy has asked permission to run the Prairie Island plant for another 20 years. The NRC has set up a site for those wanting more
information on the license extension.

3 Responses to “Restless, radioactive and rolling down the road”

  1. rvannatta Says:

    what’s the point. You wanna replace the nukes with coal plants. Every solution has costs and risks. Do you want your respirator hooked to a windmill?

  2. Big-Ahtay Says:

    Nucelar power or coal fired power plant: which is more environmentally safe? NEITHER!!!
    Obama, as we all, should understand that the by-products of these atrocious forms of power generation will be passed down to our children. In the Presidents case; passed down to his daughters and their kids to deal with because of our generations short sightedness. We’re a reactionary society so we’ll only be outraged and demand something be done when a major nuclear waste accident occurs and American citizens are killed or sickened by radioactive waste. It’s a sad state when only a slap on the wrist is given as punishment.

  3. DarthspacenVader Says:

    Although, given the volatile nature and pure energy
    that comes with Nuclear Power consider how safe it has really been.
    Exclude the waste byproducts since coal isn’t much better and
    Nuclear has been remarkably safe. We’re dealing with extreme
    levels of radiation and the potential power release of an
    atomic bomb… As bad as the waste is we can’t really knock
    on Nuclear power as far as their safety record… sure, Chernobyl
    and 3 mile island happened… but in the history of Nuclear
    energy and the potential of catastrophy that it carries that’s
    not too bad. And yes, I agree we need to utilize other technologies
    I’m simply defending Nuclear because everyone seems so quick to
    criticize it regardless of it’s amazing track record despite
    it’s potential for extreme amounts of disaster.