YOUR GUIDE TO THE TWIN CITIES
Two days after leaving Long Beach, California, the good ship Carnival Splendor was steaming toward Mexico with 3,300 heat-seeking vacationers. It was April 28, and the cruise vessel was planning to visit three Mexican ports over the next three days. A pair of newlyweds from St. Paul, Kacie Wottreng and her husband Chad, were sitting by the pool, cocktails in hand, when the captain’s voice came over the public address system.
The Carnival Splendor would make a “technical” stop in Cabo San Lucas, the captain said, but no one would be allowed to get off the ship. Something was definitely wrong. Cabo was supposed to be their third port, they knew. Soon the sun-splashed rocky bluffs of Mexico beckoned off the railing. Wottreng saw passengers streaming off other cruise ships. She saw beaches packed with sunbathers, personal watercraft zooming through blue waters. She felt like putting on a lifejacket and jumping over the side.
Hours later, after the ship had sailed out to sea, the captain spoke again: the Centers for Disease Control had advised no non-essential travel to Mexico, because of the outbreak of swine flu. Mexico was now quarantined, as far as the Carnival Splendor was concerned. No Cabo, no Mazatlan, no Puerto Vallarta. The ship was steering to the north again. The new itinerary: one day in San Francisco, instead of three days in Mexico.
Wottreng was not the only one contemplating mutiny. After three days on the ship, she felt as if the walls were caving in. Everybody knew about the swine flu outbreak when they boarded the boat April 26. But the crew had previously assured passengers that it wouldn’t change the itinerary.
Carnival Cruise Lines wasn’t offering refunds, other than a $20 port fee. Wottreng said they also offered to cut the staff’s gratuities, which are typically added onto the fixed cost. On the ship, angry passengers were crowding the guest services counter. Just let us off, many demanded. So the captain changed the itinerary once again. The ship docked in Long Beach. Wottreng said she and her husband were among a large number to give up on their vacation early. Those who remained got a half day to wander around San Francisco (recent ocean water temperature, 54 degrees, or nearly 20 degrees chillier than Cabo’s waves).
The Wottrengs’ review of their cruise, in three words: “It was awful.”
Wottreng learned later that those booked on upcoming Carnival cruises could get a credit for the full cost of their trip that can be applied to a different cruise anytime before the end of next year. But passengers on the 11 Carnival ships already at sea when the CDC advisory was issued were out of luck.
“They took zero financial responsibility for the situation,” said Wottreng, 25, who works as a registered nurse. “Why do I as the consumer have to take the whole burden and you take zero?”
Carnival Cruise Lines obviously faced a dilemma. Tens of thousands of vacationers were on their Mexico-bound ships in late April and early May. Nobody wants a floating disease factory. In the company’s view, what happened was akin to a hurricane, an unforeseen event that changes an itinerary, and passengers are advised ahead of time that they won’t get a refund in those situations.
“This was a very unfortunate situation and we apologize that we were not able to provide the itinerary that people anticipated,” Jennifer de la Cruz, public relations director for Carnival Cruise Lines, told Whistleblower in an email. She continued:
At the point the advisory was issued, we really had no choice but to cancel the stops in Mexico for all of those vessels. Unfortunately, from the West Coast, the only itinerary option other than Mexico is to sail north. We have a standard protocol for missed ports when an itinerary is impacted by events beyond our control. This is same protocol followed with regard to severe weather or other circumstances beyond our control that preclude us from making scheduled ports of call (this info is outlined in our brochure and on our web site). For any port of call we are not able to replace with an alternate port, we provide a $20 per person missed port credit. This is the protocol that was applied across all 11 ships in our fleet.
The protocol is as follows:
In the event the itinerary change becomes necessary while the ship is at sea or when notice prior to sailing is not feasible, Carnival shall attempt to substitute an alternative port. Carnival shall promptly provide written notice of the itinerary change to the guests as well as announcing the change in the Carnival Capers and via the public address system. No compensation shall be provided to guests when an alternative port is offered.
Carnival ships won’t stop in Mexico until June 15 at the earliest, de la Cruz wrote.
The different treatment of current and future passengers still strikes Wottreng as unfair. She and her husband paid $600 each for their ill-fated cruise, and that didn’t include the special drinks served in the fin-shaped cups. Or any other booze, for that matter.
“The good news is we are home and swine flu free!” Wottreng told Whistleblower. “Hopefully this doesn’t happen to anyone else.”
Learn more about RSS
May 6th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Actually, I don’t feel that bad for them. Any time you take a long trip, you can run into problems with weather. If a terrorist plot had grounded the airports like in 2001, would they have felt the same way? The cruise line has a responsibility to protect the passengers on the ship. If they had pported, and someone brought the virus back on board and everyone got sick, then people would say the crew should have known better. The money they paid was a good value for 7 nights’ lodging plus all your meals - with each meal being all you can eat. This sense of entitlement we Americans carry around is what makes the rest of the world look at us funny.
May 6th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
Wow, what a bunch of complainers. Sorry Mexico got the Swine Flu, I’m sure it is the fault of the cruuiseline. People have died from this illness, and these selfish people complain about missing a stop on their cruise. What a bunch of selfish jerks.
May 6th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
It would be interesting for the whistleblower to check
on how this is covered in the standard trip insurance
policy that Carnival offers.
May 6th, 2009 at 1:21 pm
I’m not sure the Carnival Vacation Guarantee applies,
because the ship never stopped in a foreign port. Here’s
the language of that policy:
“We’re so confident you’ll enjoy your Carnival cruise vacation, we guarantee it. Carnival is the only cruise line to offer the Vacation Guarantee*. Simply book your cruise vacation and sail away on a “Fun Ship.” If you are not completely satisfied with your cruise vacation experience, all you need to do is notify us before arrival at the first port of call and you must debark at your ship’s first non-U.S. port of call. Carnival will refund the unused portion of your cruise fare and pay your flight back.”
May 6th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
its easy to sit around and read the paper and tell
them to stop crying when they were the ones who spent
alot of money and had their vacation ruined. i’m just
glad we did not decide to go on a cruise this spring
afterall. weather is one thing, but some stupid flu is
no reason to cancel a vacation. its the flu! maybe if
people wern’t so worried about germs they might have an
immune system.
May 6th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
It was unfortunate for the travelers on that cruise but I can’t fault Carnival. Their policy regarding missing ports of call due to weather, etc is very clearly spelled out in their literature. Naturally, nobody ever thinks THEIR cruise will be the one that bypasses ports of call or experiences other changes in itinerary. Unfortunately, it happens and the passengers, if they read their documents, have been informed.
May 6th, 2009 at 3:06 pm
Interesting. A Co-Worker of mine was scheduled to go on the same cruise this past Saturday. Due to the change in stops (they went north to Vancouver) they got 50% of their tickets refunded if they stayed on the same cruise.
May 6th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
I do not believe that an offer was made to cut gratuities.
That option is available to anyone at any time and should be reserved for unsatisfactory steward and dining service. The crew that perform these tasks have no control over weather, port changes, and decisions made for health reasons.
May 6th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
I feel bad for all parties. I certainly would not want to be working for the cruise line, having to deal with irate customers. The cruise line does have to take path of lowest risk. In this case, I would say they did the right thing. And if I were on the ship, I may not be happy, but I would have gone to SF and done my best to enjoy the trip as much as possible.
May 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
I think Joker and Nancy say it best. It stinks that they weren’t able to go to Mexico, but it can hardly be blamed on Carnival.