StarTribune.com

A robust debate over drive-throughs, electric mobility scooters, civil rights and personal responsibility

Posted on June 15th, 2009 – 11:03 AM
By James Shiffer

Ariel Wade called Whistleblower last week to say she had been refused service at the 24-hour White Castle. Her story was told in words, pictures and video on Sunday. The reactions to the story have been strong, judging by the phone calls, emails and more than 200 online comments. I knew that would be the case, so I warned Wade ahead of time, knowing that many of them would be nasty. That’s something I’m having to do regularly now, because commenters are ready to pounce on anyone who speaks publicly about feeling they’ve been mistreated by the system. Some have asked me why we allow commenting at all. My response is, because the news audience of 2009 expects and demands it, and I would rather have those discussions going on with the source of the chatter in close proximity. Our web site allows users to turn comments off, if they turn you off.

2 Responses to “A robust debate over drive-throughs, electric mobility scooters, civil rights and personal responsibility”

  1. Keith Stengler Says:

    This is a joke. Plain and simply, the “scooter” is not
    a street legal vehicle! Therefore it should not be in
    the drive-thru lane! If for nothing else than safety
    reasons.
    People, use your brains!!!

  2. Bodil Says:

    White castle did that fattie a favor.

Leave a Reply