Last month I wrote about the ordeal of Pete and Ethel Nelson, who are battling the Metropolitan Council over who will pay to repair their home and yard in the aftermath of an immense sewer reconstruction project. The start of the next phase of the sewer upgrade has been a contentious issue before the Victoria City Council, with council member Kim Roden putting the Met Council’s feet to the fire about improving the way it responds to property owners’ claims of collateral damage. Today, Roden told me she’s pressuring the regional government to take a second look at the struggle of another Victoria property owner, Gary Corwin.
Corwin, a pilot for the airline formerly known as Northwest, has lived on Virginia Shores Circle with his family since 1988. He told Whistleblower that the excavation for the sewer shifted the footings under his deck, cracked his foundation and warped his house to the point that windows and doors don’t open and close. “You can tell it looked like an earthquake,” he said. He estimates the damage at $200,000 to $250,000.
Just as the Nelsons were instructed to do, Corwin filed a claim with the insurance carrier for contractor S.M. Hentges and Sons. That insurance company happens to be American International Group, better known as AIG, the recipient of $180 billion in bailout money from U.S. taxpayers after its disastrous business decisions threatened to torpedo the nation’s economy. In Corwin’s case, such largesse was not reciprocal. In March, AIG denied his claim, saying videotapes taken before the construction of Corwin’s house showed the cracks to be pre-existing.
That same month, however, a forensic engineering report commissioned by Corwin’s insurer, American Family Insurance, determined that even though many of the cracks were present in the house, “the construction on and along Smithtown Road not only caused the existing cracks to open up more but caused additional damages to this dwelling.” So Corwin was lucky – his insurance company will compensate him, and then take on the fight with AIG to get paid back.
From the Met Council’s perspective, the Corwin claim is a dispute between insurance companies and the agency isn’t involved. After AIG denied Corwin’s claim, the Met Council “requested an inspection of the Corwin residence to investigate claim” but was denied by the family, according to a June 8 summary of property damage claims. Roden said she got a commitment from a Met Council staff member to visit with Corwin and see the damage for himself.
In the meantime, the Victoria council has delayed a vote on the next phase of the sewer project for two weeks. It’s now scheduled for July 27, Roden said.
“Airline formerly known as Northwest”. I sense a bit of bitterness. Can you just say “Delta” and leave it at that next time?
We need more background here.
The met council should be responsible for the sewer line
up to the residence, and the resident is responsible for
the hookup costs.
If the property is so fragile as to be affected by
excavation in nearby land, then the house was built on
a poor foundation. Either the construction firm is at
fault, or the city who approved the foundation work.
NOT the county.
Steve- awfully simplified structural analysis. How far away from the house was the excavation? how much dirt did they move? Set backs could have been only 15 ft. or less. Did the excavation temporarily lower the water table? Some times they have to pump the excavation to work; removing the water from under the guys house could cause problems. The bottom line her is we don’t have anywhere near enough info to judge EXCEPT 20 year old houses shifting immediately after or during nearby excavation is decidely suspect.
@rap: It’s not bitterness, he was never a pilot for Delta but for NWA.
That’s like saying I’m a resident of France… Because I live in a plot of land formerly owned by the French.
I’d like some free money as well
please come by my house and I’ll
sue you!
I live in Dayton and if they worked on the sewers in Victoria like they worked up here, I don’t for one minute question that damage can happen. My house shook so hard when they were excavating and I
could see the walls moving. I had to look around to see what got damaged. The Met Council should
pay for the damage. I would also like to know what is with the SAC fee that the Met Council charges for hooking up after they mess up the property. A bunch of robber barons.
Maybe the guy should have let the Met inspect his
property? Sounds like his ins. covered it too.
Knowing this contractor and the Damages they cause on other projects along with their seemingly careless attitude towards UTILITIES marked per the legal requirements, they will hit nearly anything and everything within the construction Limits no matter how well they are marked.
They hit numerous Natural Gas Lines and took out a 4″ PHONE Cable (Cutting phone and 911 service to a huge chunk of Carver County) when they built CR 11 through Victoria a few years ago. At the same time they were building Hundertmark Road in Chaska and hit a 4″+ Gas Main next to the St. Andrews Lutheran Church West at Hundertmark and Bavaria Road.
Need to know more, just check on any project they have worked on in the past 10-years, contact the City or County Engineering staff thay work with and you might be amazed they are still in business and nobody I know of has been killed yet.
My question is what is the Met Council doing way out in Victoria? I wanted to buy some property about 20 years ago along the 212 bluff just north of Chaska and the Met Council blocked the sale because the proposed project would have required sewer and water. They said the Met range would nevergo that far outside of the Twin Cities. So this just floors me that they are in Victoria now.
I am witness to damage caused by construction for new sewer and road construction. My house also shook so bad that I have nails coming thru the sheetrock. County Road 21 in Prior Lake was terrible, the association tennis court had to be replaced because the “slight preexisting cracks turned massive and the retaining wall started to collapes.
not to mention that they higt the gas line three times during the process.
Ok who are they related to on the MET council that they keep winning the bid contracts with that kind of history…something smells like rotten fish and looks like they are playing pocket pool with each other.
What is the point of the article? That AIG is bad. The
had a few cracks in his foundation… not unusual. What
kind of reporting is this. Maybe the point is that ALL
companies are bad???
Learn more about RSS