Minneapolis man tried to pay with a perfectly good check, but the big computer said no

Posted on July 31st, 2009 – 2:34 PM
By James Shiffer

Tom Campbell, 57, is a retired bus mechanic who lives in Minneapolis. To get control of his spending, Campbell decided to put away the credit card and take out his long-neglected checkbook. He recently paid a visit to Southtown Center in Bloomington to buy a wedding present, an $80 place setting. When he wrote out his check at a prominent retailer, the clerk put it through the little scanning device linked to the vast computers of a company called Certegy. The machine spit the check out. Rejected.

Situations like that always make me feel nervous. The few times in my life that a clerk has rejected my method of payment, I expected to leave the store in handcuffs.

Campbell knew he had enough money in the bank. So he went to another retailer where the bride and groom were also registered. Once again, the machine refused his check. He tried to get the clerk to explain what was going on, but it was clear she didn’t know. He talked to someone on the phone at Certegy, who said he could fill out an application. Finally he paid by credit card, and called Whistleblower.

“If they accept checks, there shouldn’t be a bunch of barriers,” Campbell said. “It shouldn’t be a secret that they have this check protection company.”

Certegy is part of a company called Fidelity National Information Services, based in Jacksonville, Florida. On Thursday, I spoke with Chip Funk, Certegy’s affable vice president of contact center services. Funk told me he didn’t know the specifics of Campbell’s transactions, but figured he knew what was going on.

The days are long gone when merchants checked on a check by contacting the issuing bank. Instead, Certegy and other companies, most notably TeleCheck, maintain vast databases similar to credit reporting companies, except the data they maintain are a consumer’s checkwriting history, Funk told me. It has formulas that use that information, as well as the specifics of the transaction, to decide on a yea or nay for a check.

“If a consumer very rarely writes a check… if we haven’t seen a whole lot of history with him, and all of a sudden we see him writing a couple of checks, then we may decline to approve them,” Funk said. Unlike a credit card company, which often calls a cardholder if it sees some suspicious transactions, Certegy often doesn’t have much personal information about the checkwriter.

“Unfortunately in this day and age, there’s far too much check fraud going on,” he said. “We’re trying to help the retailer. At the same time, we’re trying to protect consumers. It’s a difficult situation to be in. We decline very few checks. From time to time, we know we’ll decline checks every now and then that might be good. We get paid by approving checks, not declining them. We hope we’re making good decisions. We aren’t perfect.”

Fortunately, in the same way that consumers have a right to their credit histories, they have a right to their histories with check-verification companies. Funk said Campbell or anyone else can request their FACT report, as it’s known, by sending the company an email (consumer.inquire@fnis.com) or calling the company toll-free at (866) 543-6315. It typically includes transactions from the previous 13 months. Checkwriters who find their checks improperly rejected can also fill out a credit card-style application, or apply over the phone, to enable them to get their future checks approved. The application is free.

Now that Campbell has received a crash course in the world of check verification, he wishes merchants and customer services reps would get more acquainted with it.

“The general public, I doubt they know this routine,” he said. As for the clerks he dealt with, “these poor kids never saw a paper check.”

The shorter print version of the story has generated a robust discussion. So I guess paper checks aren’t dead, after all.

8 Responses to “Minneapolis man tried to pay with a perfectly good check, but the big computer said no”

  1. kevin Says:

    so let me get this straight…this check *verification* service doesn’t base their approval of the check on whether there is money in the bank to cover it, but rather on if they *think*, based on the person’s check-writing history, and their determination that the check is legit or not? i totally agree that there needs to me much more education of everyone in the process that’s behind check verification and approval. i’ve been writing checks at retailers for a long time and had no idea that this is how they are *approved*. this is something that definitely needs to be published.

  2. Charles Says:

    Well, this along with all else going on in “Financial
    World” is hardly a surprise… We got call from BOA that
    to “access your loan data on net” you will have to be a [p
    paid subscriber”.. Seems that since the incompetent robber
    barons have “lost” (a amusing term) to much they are not ‘
    out ot get fees for anything. This “we do not check the
    balance for approval” is not surprising, the money bought
    congress and they all do as they wish.. so the citizens
    now pay.. in one way or other and then send the same
    corrupted bunch back for another term. Sorry but USA is in
    downhill side of power, we mimic Rome, import all, worship
    our gladiators and have a “Senate” full of nit wits..bye
    bye USA.. somewhere over last 30 years we lost what we were.

  3. Whistleblower » Blog Archive » Minneapolis man tried to pay with a … – The Facebook News Says:

    […] James Shiffer wrote an interesting post today onWhistleblower » Blog Archive » Minneapolis man tried to pay with a <b>…</b>Here’s a quick excerpt […]

  4. Jeff Says:

    We have much more to fear from Big Business than we do from Big Government.
    With stories like these, and retailers complicity with such tactics, more stores deserve to go bankrupt. As for all the yahoos who criticize those who prefer to use checks, go ahead and use your debit and credit cards all you want. And when you become an identity theft victim or have your accounts wiped out, don’t look to me for any sympathy.

  5. Timm Says:

    Jeff, we can choose to do business with Big Business. Big Government, on the other hand is completely unaccountable and has violence and theft and imprisonment as its only recourse. I agree that this is an injustice. Justice can be served by sites like this exposing it, and maybe that business WILL go bankrupt if enough of us are fed up with check-checking services that generalize and do their customers (and their customers’ customers) a disservice. With business (at least when business isn’t strangled and co-opted and bailed-out by losers like Obama) their IS accountability. Next stop on the no-accountability and all-coercion train: your healthcare. Huzzah!

  6. D Says:

    He should have used Obama’s checkbook. No problems then….

  7. Susan Kulawik Says:

    I’d suggest using a debit card. It’s like an instant check.

  8. Glenn Says:

    The internet is littered with complaints about this company and their practices. Their claim that this check rejection happens infrequently seems to be demonstrably false by all of the complaints, including mine. They rejected my perfectly good check today. The merchant has my driver’s license that matches my check. They also have my Amex card. The checking account has been in good standing for 20 years with plenty in it to cover the check. Calling Certegy gets them to admit that there is nothing wrong with my account but they still aren’t going to accept my check. Somebody needs to put these jokers out of business.